comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: fix(4.70*100) is... 469
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: fix(4.70*100) is... 469 [message #53568 is a reply to message #53567] Wed, 18 April 2007 21:31 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Qing is currently offline  Qing
Messages: 12
Registered: February 2007
Junior Member
On Apr 19, 8:48 am, b_efrem...@yahoo.com wrote:
> Hi Guys,
> There's something I can not explain to myself, so maybe someone can
> enlighten me?
> print,fix(4.70*100)
> 469
> and also:
> print,string(4.70*100,format='(i3)')
> 469
>
> While, everything else that came into my head to try was OK like:
> print,fix(5.70*100)
> 570
> print,fix(3.70*100)
> 370
> print,fix(4.60*100)
> 460
> print,string(4.60*100,format='(i3)')
> 460
> ...
> etc..
>
> Thanks in advance!
> Cheers.
> Boryana

Look at that!
IDL> print, double(4.7)
4.6999998
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: sparsab, sparsax and complex arrays
Next Topic: Re: idl 6.1 crashes on linux

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 06:35:56 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.12383 seconds