comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: variables in common blocks

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: variables in common blocks

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: variables in common blocks [message #53861]

Fri, 04 May 2007 09:48

David Fanning
Messages: 11724
Registered: August 2001

Senior Member

Christopher Thom writes:

> Well...I tend to store all my reduced data in IDL .sav files, then read
> them whenever I want to run a routine. So which is more evil...sav files
> or common blocks? *ducks* :-)

I'm dealing with save files in *combination* with common
blocks. This is truly a lethal combination unless you
can train yourself to NEVER CHANGE THE FRIGGIN DEFINITON
of the common block.

Oh, sorry...

Cheers,

David
--
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/
Sepore ma de ni thui. ("Perhaps thou speakest truth.")

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: variables in common blocks By: David Fanning on Fri, 04 May 2007 09:48
		Re: variables in common blocks By: Christopher Thom on Fri, 04 May 2007 09:40
		Re: variables in common blocks By: David Fanning on Fri, 04 May 2007 09:03
		Re: variables in common blocks By: lasse on Fri, 04 May 2007 08:56
		Re: variables in common blocks By: Foldy Lajos on Fri, 04 May 2007 08:36
		Re: variables in common blocks By: David Fanning on Fri, 04 May 2007 08:16
		Re: variables in common blocks By: Maarten[1] on Fri, 04 May 2007 08:07
		Re: variables in common blocks By: lasse on Fri, 04 May 2007 07:42
		Re: variables in common blocks By: David Fanning on Fri, 04 May 2007 07:11
		Re: variables in common blocks By: lasse on Fri, 04 May 2007 07:06
		Re: variables in common blocks By: David Fanning on Fri, 04 May 2007 06:45

Previous Topic:	limited angle CT
Next Topic:	IDL number output format problem?

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sat Oct 11 13:25:06 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.35651 seconds