Hardware Configuration for IDL Application [message #1701] |
Thu, 10 February 1994 01:01  |
xiaoming
Messages: 11 Registered: August 1993
|
Junior Member |
|
|
Hello you experts,
For application of IDL and very large image, we have to decide what
kind of hardware configuration should be set up, PC or Workstation?
certainly we must consider the cost for that.
Do you have any suggestion? Let's discuss it.
Thank you!
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~
Dr XU, Xiaoming GOOD LUCK!!!
Dept. of Remote Sensing, |\/\/\/|
image processing and Cartography | |
| |
Institute for (0)(0) |
Applied Geodesy and Photogrammetry _( @
Graz University of Technology, AUSTRIA |___, |
\ /
P-mail: Steyrergasse 30, A-8010 Graz ooOoo /----\ ooOoo
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ --------- ----------
The universe is full of magical things patiently waits for our wits
to grow sharper. .
E. Phillports o
oo
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~O ~O~~~~~~~
|
|
|
Re: Hardware configuration [message #54109 is a reply to message #1701] |
Mon, 21 May 2007 14:38  |
Rick Towler
Messages: 821 Registered: August 1998
|
Senior Member |
|
|
patrick.dillmann@gmx.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I intend to buy a new PC and now I have to know if it is better to use
> a core 2 duo system (e.g. 2.4GHz) or a single core system (e.g.
> 3.4GHz).
For the most part, this was covered a couple of weeks back in this
thread: http://tinyurl.com/35ov4v
The gist is that the core architecture is much more efficient clock for
clock than the P4 Netburst architecture so a 2.4 GHz core system will
most likely exceed the performance of a faster 3.4 GHz P4.
> Does IDL 6.1 support core 2 duo systems under Win XP
Yes, to a certain extent. Some functions are multi-threaded so if your
application makes use of them you'll get a bit of a boost. It is highly
application specific though.
> and is
> it faster to separte calculations on 2 cores than on a faster single
> core?
Assuming you are talking about your previously mentioned 2.4 and 3.4GHz
chips then your question is irrelevant since the a single thread running
on the core 2 chip will most likely execute faster than a single thread
on the P4.
If you are talking in general terms, it depends on a number of factors
and you'll need to be more specific.
-Rick
|
|
|