comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » FastDL
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
FastDL [message #54063] Thu, 17 May 2007 06:30 Go to next message
Chris W is currently offline  Chris W
Messages: 12
Registered: May 2007
Junior Member
Hi everyone,

I would like to ask if anyone has experience with the FastDL
products. We are considering them to process sub regions of data in
parallel, with no "interaction" between the different data sets.

If anyone could describe their experiences with FastDL I would
appreciate it, or if something is available for this as well.

Thanks
Chris
Re: FastDL [message #54182 is a reply to message #54063] Wed, 23 May 2007 16:28 Go to previous message
Trae is currently offline  Trae
Messages: 23
Registered: May 2007
Junior Member
I've been looking into this too. It seems easy to use and will add
true clustering capability to IDL jobs with very minimal effort.

However...
1. Their sales staff have been less than responsive to my inquiries.
2. Man! It is expensive. For an academic license it would be $9,000
for the full FastDl package for 64 CPUS. They count a dual core chip
as two CPUs and a quad core as 4. It is $5,500 for just the mpiDL
which is what you need if you want to do cluster operations as opposed
to grid operations.

UGH!

I'm doing plasma physics simulations and have to crunch lots of data
and make lots of movies. I might have paid the price of their sales
staff ever got back with me after my second, or third email. Now I
might use the money to buy another new computer.

Let me know if you find out anything.

Cheers,
-Trae

On May 17, 7:30 am, Chris W <cwood1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I would like to ask if anyone has experience with the FastDL
> products. We are considering them to process sub regions of data in
> parallel, with no "interaction" between the different data sets.
>
> If anyone could describe their experiences with FastDL I would
> appreciate it, or if something is available for this as well.
>
> Thanks
> Chris
Re: FastDL [message #54183 is a reply to message #54063] Wed, 23 May 2007 15:38 Go to previous message
Trae is currently offline  Trae
Messages: 23
Registered: May 2007
Junior Member
I've been looking into this too. It seems easy to use and will add
true clustering capability to IDL jobs with very minimal effort.

However...
1. Their sales staff have been less than responsive to my inquiries.
2. Man! It is expensive. For an academic license it would be $9,000
for the full FastDl package for 64 CPUS. They count a dual core chip
as two CPUs and a quad core as 4. It is $5,500 for just the mpiDL
which is what you need if you want to do cluster operations as opposed
to grid operations. It sounds like you want grid operations only so
that would be $4,000 for up to 64 CPUs with TaskDL.


I'm doing plasma physics simulations and have to crunch lots of data
and make lots of movies. I might have paid the price if their sales
staff ever got back with me after my second, or third email. Now I
might use the money to buy another new computer.

Let me know if you find out anything. I'm interested in trying to make
a cluster (preferably a Mac cluster) that is easy for IDL's multi-
threading and IDL_IDLBridge to use.

Cheers,
-Trae

On May 17, 7:30 am, Chris W <cwood1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I would like to ask if anyone has experience with the FastDL
> products. We are considering them to process sub regions of data in
> parallel, with no "interaction" between the different data sets.
>
> If anyone could describe their experiences with FastDL I would
> appreciate it, or if something is available for this as well.
>
> Thanks
> Chris
Re: FastDL [message #54185 is a reply to message #54063] Wed, 23 May 2007 14:58 Go to previous message
Trae is currently offline  Trae
Messages: 23
Registered: May 2007
Junior Member
I've been looking into this too. It seems easy to use and will add
true clustering capability to IDL jobs with very minimal effort.

However...
1. Their sales staff have been less than responsive to my inquiries.
2. Man! It is expensive. For an academic license it would be $9,000
for the full FastDl package for 64 CPUS. They count a dual core chip
as two CPUs and a quad core as 4. It is $5,500 for just the mpiDL
which is what you need if you want to do cluster operations as opposed
to grid operations. It sounds like you want grid operations only so
that would be $4,000 for up to 64 CPUs with TaskDL.


I'm doing plasma physics simulations and have to crunch lots of data
and make lots of movies. I might have paid the price if their sales
staff ever got back with me after my second, or third email. Now I
might use the money to buy another new computer.

Let me know if you find out anything. I'm interested in trying to make
a cluster (preferably a Mac cluster) that is easy for IDL's multi-
threading and IDL_IDLBridge to use.

Cheers,
-Trae

On May 17, 7:30 am, Chris W <cwood1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I would like to ask if anyone has experience with the FastDL
> products. We are considering them to process sub regions of data in
> parallel, with no "interaction" between the different data sets.
>
> If anyone could describe their experiences with FastDL I would
> appreciate it, or if something is available for this as well.
>
> Thanks
> Chris
  Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Previous Topic: From C to IDL questions
Next Topic: Resolution problem in 'write_jpg' : Can I upgrade the output image?

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 11:51:23 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00636 seconds