Re: Idl 5.6 &linux [message #54498] |
Tue, 19 June 2007 07:59  |
rkombiyil
Messages: 59 Registered: March 2006
|
Member |
|
|
On Jun 19, 9:43 pm, Cecil <cecilia.devec...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi folks!
> I've installed IDL 5.6 under linux (ubuntu feisty). It seems work
> fine, but the shortcuts don't go and a simple script that I've write
> under windows don't run, so I tried with a single line with a
> read_tiff but Idl says "error".....what's the problem?
> Thanks in advance.
> Regards
Well, shortcuts to what? And where are they "not" going? Shortcuts are
meant to go somewhere, right? :) Well, if you wrote a script that runs
under windoze, do you expect it to be cross-platform compatible?! The
conventions (drives) and the slashes (/ vs. \) are all different, so
will be the "locations (paths)" where they are installed (/usr/local/
rsi in GNU/Linux and "I don't know where" in windows).
In short, reading your post, it is not clear what you want to tell
us..
~rk
|
|
|
Re: Idl 5.6 &linux [message #54594 is a reply to message #54498] |
Fri, 22 June 2007 01:53  |
cecilia.devecchi
Messages: 6 Registered: November 2006
|
Junior Member |
|
|
I see :) ...I try to explain better:
1) E.g: to copy under linux the keyboard :) shortcut is ALT+C and to
paste ALT+V but don't go
2) I don't expect that the windows script is compatible under linux
but the simple row: image=read_tiff('home/kit/32G.tif') don't go
On 19 Giu, 16:59, metachronist <rkombi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 19, 9:43 pm, Cecil <cecilia.devec...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi folks!
>> I've installedIDL5.6underlinux(ubuntu feisty). It seems work
>> fine, but the shortcuts don't go and a simple script that I've write
>> under windows don't run, so I tried with a single line with a
>> read_tiff butIdlsays "error".....what's the problem?
>> Thanks in advance.
>> Regards
>
> Well, shortcuts to what? And where are they "not" going? Shortcuts are
> meant to go somewhere, right? :) Well, if you wrote a script that runs
> under windoze, do you expect it to be cross-platform compatible?! The
> conventions (drives) and the slashes (/ vs. \) are all different, so
> will be the "locations (paths)" where they are installed (/usr/local/
> rsi in GNU/Linuxand "I don't know where" in windows).
> In short, reading your post, it is not clear what you want to tell
> us..
> ~rk
|
|
|