comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: Programmatic size adjustment of widgets under Windows vs. UNIX (was "Natural size of explicitly-sized widget")

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Programmatic size adjustment of widgets under Windows vs. UNIX (was "Natural size of explicitly-sized widget")

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Programmatic size adjustment of widgets under Windows vs. UNIX (was "Natural size of explicitly-sized widget") [message #55591]

Sat, 01 September 2007 19:26

Craig Markwardt
Messages: 1869
Registered: November 1996

Senior Member

David Fanning <news@dfanning.com> writes:

> "to hell with the UNIX people, they're used to things
> looking like crap anyway." ...

I was ready to take offense at this and then I realized... it's true,
for the most part.
:-S

--
------------------------------------------------------------ --------------
Craig B. Markwardt, Ph.D. EMAIL: craigmnet@REMOVEcow.physics.wisc.edu
Astrophysics, IDL, Finance, Derivatives | Remove "net" for better response
------------------------------------------------------------ --------------

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: Programmatic size adjustment of widgets under Windows vs. UNIX (was "Natural size of explicitly-sized widget") By: Craig Markwardt on Sat, 01 September 2007 19:26
		Re: Programmatic size adjustment of widgets under Windows vs. UNIX (was "Natural size of explicitly-sized widget") By: Jean-Paul Davis on Wed, 29 August 2007 16:44
		Re: Programmatic size adjustment of widgets under Windows vs. UNIX (was "Natural size of explicitly-sized widget") By: R.G.Stockwell on Wed, 29 August 2007 15:55
		Re: Programmatic size adjustment of widgets under Windows vs. UNIX (was "Natural size of explicitly-sized widget") By: David Fanning on Wed, 29 August 2007 15:23

Previous Topic:	Re: xyouts for iPlot?
Next Topic:	Re: how to create a string of 1024 spaces?

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sat Oct 11 16:58:50 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.15973 seconds