comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Accurate/fast interpolation
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Accurate/fast interpolation [message #55717 is a reply to message #55703] Tue, 04 September 2007 07:47 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
mattf is currently offline  mattf
Messages: 13
Registered: January 2007
Junior Member
On Sep 4, 7:32 am, Steve <f...@k.e> wrote:
> Does anybody have a suggestion of speedups that might help in the
> following scenario...
>
> In a series of images there is a very small shift between succesive
> frames due to orbital dynamics on a spacecraft.
>
> For each image I can translate all the pixel locations to and from a
> common reference frame. The shift beween adjacent frames is sub pixel
> [typical value about 0.2].
>
> What I am trying at the moment is to set one image as a common
> reference, covert all the others to sub pixel positions on that
> reference frame and then use triangulate and trigrid to interpolate
> image values onto this common reference frame. This seems to work but
> is painfully slow [trigrid is fine triangulate takes many seconds].
>
> I just wondered since my data is nearly on the right grid to start with
> if there were a quicker way to do this?
>
> Any help gratefully appreciated
>
> S.R.Crothers [at] rl.ac.uk

Maybe a brute-force approach-- 'up-sample' your data so that the
displacements are full pixels rather than part-pixels. This leaves you
with a quantization error, but you've already got a larger
quantization error in the original image, no?
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Indexing problem.. Please help me out!!!
Next Topic: Rick Towler please come in again!I can't send a email to you?!

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Thu Oct 09 20:46:09 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.48339 seconds