comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: NCEP Reanalysis Temperature Data Problem
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: NCEP Reanalysis Temperature Data Problem [message #56511 is a reply to message #56510] Thu, 25 October 2007 10:48 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
David Fanning is currently offline  David Fanning
Messages: 11724
Registered: August 2001
Senior Member
ben.bighair writes:

> While it is hard to figure out the benchmark date - the difference in
> the two might be close to the number of hours between 1948 and 2007.
> Perhaps it's wishful thinking, but if you know the final date you
> might be able to use the first record as a bench mark and figure
> subsequent dates from there.
>
> IDL> t1=17590104 & t0 = 17067072
> IDL> print, t1-t0
> 523032
> IDL> print,(2007-1948)*365.25*24.
> 517194.

Yeah, I've been down that road, too. But, again,
the numbers just don't ever add up. Which leads
me to think it is also a dead end. Seconds, years, ...
Milliseconds comes closest, but for gridded data
and a monthly average!? Even govenment scientists
aren't that... Well, never mind. I almost is one on
this project. :-)

Cheers,

David
--
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Widget Tables Sizes Variable in Two Dimensions
Next Topic: Using SYMCAT with LEGEND

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 13:36:09 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.05669 seconds