comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: time

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: time_test replacement?

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: time_test replacement? [message #56655]

Wed, 07 November 2007 14:29

Kenneth Bowman
Messages: 86
Registered: November 2006

Member

In article <pan.2007.11.07.19.51.00.407762@as.arizona.edu>,
JD Smith <jdsmith@as.arizona.edu> wrote:

> On Wed, 07 Nov 2007 10:26:25 -0800, mike.walker wrote:
>
>> Is there a valid cross-platform benchmark for IDL? I know there has
>> been on and off discussions of OS-limiting factors including caching,
>> etc. Have those been worked out in 6.2+ for the most part? Are there
>> any other time_test-like benchmarks included with the release, or any
>> floating out there?
>
> Not really. Ken Bowman ran a few simple tests recently and compiled
> the results (including TIME_TEST3), but the page is no longer
> available. In the long distant days of yore I had IDLSPEC, which used
> TIME_TEST. For fun I dug up the old page and put it back online:
>
> http://idlwave.org/idlspec/is2.html

I also found my old page and dragged it into the correct directory.

http://idl.tamu.edu/benchmarks.php

It is not very up to date or very cross platform, but it might
be of interest.

Don't all computers use Intel processors now? ;-)

Ken

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: time_test replacement? By: Kenneth Bowman on Wed, 07 November 2007 14:29
		Re: time_test replacement? By: JD Smith on Wed, 07 November 2007 11:51

Previous Topic:	IDL structure to HDF-5
Next Topic:	Re: howto make a fits cube in IDL?

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 18:21:10 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00426 seconds