comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: 'analyzing code' and # of pro files

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: 'analyzing code' and # of pro files

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: 'analyzing code' and # of pro files [message #57183]

Thu, 06 December 2007 09:11

Allan Whiteford
Messages: 117
Registered: June 2006

Senior Member

R.G. Stockwell wrote:
> Just curious, how many *.pro files does everyone have?
>

The total number of .pro files I have in my home directory, from:

find ~ -name '*.pro' | sed 's/.*\///' | wc -l

is 39977.

The total number with unique names coming from:

find ~ -name '*.pro' | sed 's/.*\///' | sort | uniq | wc -l

is 5479.

Having seen those numbers for the first time, I'm a little worried about
the large difference between them number of files and the number of
unique files.

If I were to take a conservative guess at the directories I'd include as
projects if I ever used the DE then running the above command on the
relevant directories gives me 1977 files (1968 unique which is a much
nicer discrepancy to have!).

Thanks,

Allan

Report message to a moderator

Re: 'analyzing code' and # of pro files [message #57190 is a reply to message #57183]

Thu, 06 December 2007 08:23

Vince Hradil
Messages: 574
Registered: December 1999

Senior Member

On Dec 6, 9:55 am, "R.G. Stockwell" <noem...@please.com> wrote:
> Just curious, how many *.pro files does everyone have?
>
> This may be one thing that IDL hadn't properly gauged when
> they implemented the 'analyzing code' routines.
> I did a quick search, and find 2959 files in my library. This
> includes several 'other author' libraries.
>
> When I start IDL7, it takes 3.5 minutes to analyze code,
> and frankly I can't tell if those libraries are in my project.
> The only thing my project shows is 'untitled'.

5492 *.pro file - 5.5 minutes - WinXP 2GB memory (very little load)
for comparison: emacs/idl-pvwave found library(390) user(15511)
system(2469) [not sure exactly what those numbers mean] in 1.5
minutes!!

I think I know which one I like the best...

Signed,
Big fan of JD!

Report message to a moderator

Re: 'analyzing code' and # of pro files [message #57193 is a reply to message #57190]

Thu, 06 December 2007 08:07

henrygroe
Messages: 30
Registered: August 2003

Member

On Dec 6, 8:55 am, "R.G. Stockwell" <noem...@please.com> wrote:
> Just curious, how many *.pro files does everyone have?
>
> This may be one thing that IDL hadn't properly gauged when
> they implemented the 'analyzing code' routines.
> I did a quick search, and find 2959 files in my library. This
> includes several 'other author' libraries.
>
> When I start IDL7, it takes 3.5 minutes to analyze code,
> and frankly I can't tell if those libraries are in my project.
> The only thing my project shows is 'untitled'.

3442

I'm beginning to think I won't be upgrading to 7.0 next week as I'd
originally planned....

Report message to a moderator

Re: 'analyzing code' and # of pro files [message #57380 is a reply to message #57183]

Thu, 06 December 2007 09:20

David Fanning
Messages: 11724
Registered: August 2001

Senior Member

Allan Whiteford writes:

> The total number of .pro files I have in my home directory, from:
>
> find ~ -name '*.pro' | sed 's/.*\///' | wc -l
>
> is 39977.
>
> The total number with unique names coming from:
>
> find ~ -name '*.pro' | sed 's/.*\///' | sort | uniq | wc -l
>
> is 5479.

Don't worry, this is normal on UNIX systems. In my experience
debugging other people's code, it is likely you have 15 versions
of the Coyote directory in your path. And God knows how many
versions of the Astro library, which is older yet. :-)

Cheers,

David

--
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic:	Re: eclipse ridiculously slow over ssh
Next Topic:	IDL 7 Conspiracy Theory

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 13:45:50 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00701 seconds