Re: IDL 7.0/Eclipse DE memory hogger [message #57240] |
Wed, 05 December 2007 15:57 |
David Fanning
Messages: 11724 Registered: August 2001
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Vince Hradil writes:
> I'm on WinXP and mine is about 170MB (500MB virtual size)
I just picked up 4 GByte of RAM (for $240) and a new
500 GByte hard drive (for $105), so I'm good to go.
I'm planning to deduce this from my taxes this year
and from my maintenance contract next year. I know it's
double dipping, but what the hell. :-)
Cheers,
David
--
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/
Sepore ma de ni thui. ("Perhaps thou speakest truth.")
|
|
|
Re: IDL 7.0/Eclipse DE memory hogger [message #57243 is a reply to message #57240] |
Wed, 05 December 2007 15:48  |
Vince Hradil
Messages: 574 Registered: December 1999
|
Senior Member |
|
|
On Dec 5, 5:41 pm, rochelle <rmccre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Actually, it's finished it's analyzing and is sitting on 100MB Memory
> usage and javaw.exe is at 34MB.
> I only have 460MB of RAM!
> Maybe I should go back to school and wait to receive a new laptop that
> our new government in Oz has promised to the schoolkiddies...
>
> On Dec 6, 10:34 am, Vince Hradil <hrad...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> On Dec 5, 5:17 pm, rochelle <rmccre...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> Hi,
>>> I installed the new version of IDL on my pc to have a look at the DE.
>>> I did notice on Windows XP the application chews up large amount of
>>> memory.
>>> IDL 6.4 running the DE takes up about 11MB, whereas IDL 7.0 chews
>>> about 90MB, plus about 30MB for java.
>>> Given I have limited memory resources and often need to load large
>>> data sets, I'm wondering if there is a way to reduce the overhead. Or
>>> should I just stick to 6.4?
>
>> Does it release any memory after it is done "Analyzing code..."?
I'm on WinXP and mine is about 170MB (500MB virtual size)
|
|
|
Re: IDL 7.0/Eclipse DE memory hogger [message #57244 is a reply to message #57243] |
Wed, 05 December 2007 15:41  |
rochelle
Messages: 3 Registered: August 2007
|
Junior Member |
|
|
Actually, it's finished it's analyzing and is sitting on 100MB Memory
usage and javaw.exe is at 34MB.
I only have 460MB of RAM!
Maybe I should go back to school and wait to receive a new laptop that
our new government in Oz has promised to the schoolkiddies...
On Dec 6, 10:34 am, Vince Hradil <hrad...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Dec 5, 5:17 pm, rochelle <rmccre...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I installed the new version of IDL on my pc to have a look at the DE.
>> I did notice on Windows XP the application chews up large amount of
>> memory.
>> IDL 6.4 running the DE takes up about 11MB, whereas IDL 7.0 chews
>> about 90MB, plus about 30MB for java.
>> Given I have limited memory resources and often need to load large
>> data sets, I'm wondering if there is a way to reduce the overhead. Or
>> should I just stick to 6.4?
>
> Does it release any memory after it is done "Analyzing code..."?
|
|
|
Re: IDL 7.0/Eclipse DE memory hogger [message #57247 is a reply to message #57244] |
Wed, 05 December 2007 15:34  |
Vince Hradil
Messages: 574 Registered: December 1999
|
Senior Member |
|
|
On Dec 5, 5:17 pm, rochelle <rmccre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> I installed the new version of IDL on my pc to have a look at the DE.
> I did notice on Windows XP the application chews up large amount of
> memory.
> IDL 6.4 running the DE takes up about 11MB, whereas IDL 7.0 chews
> about 90MB, plus about 30MB for java.
> Given I have limited memory resources and often need to load large
> data sets, I'm wondering if there is a way to reduce the overhead. Or
> should I just stick to 6.4?
Does it release any memory after it is done "Analyzing code..."?
|
|
|
Re: IDL 7.0/Eclipse DE memory hogger [message #57251 is a reply to message #57247] |
Wed, 05 December 2007 15:24  |
David Fanning
Messages: 11724 Registered: August 2001
|
Senior Member |
|
|
rochelle writes:
> I installed the new version of IDL on my pc to have a look at the DE.
> I did notice on Windows XP the application chews up large amount of
> memory.
> IDL 6.4 running the DE takes up about 11MB, whereas IDL 7.0 chews
> about 90MB, plus about 30MB for java.
> Given I have limited memory resources and often need to load large
> data sets, I'm wondering if there is a way to reduce the overhead. Or
> should I just stick to 6.4?
I'm not even going to suggest a solution, but I will
point out that my now useless Sony Vaio will only
permit a maximum of 512 MByte of RAM. :-(
Cheers,
David
--
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/
Sepore ma de ni thui. ("Perhaps thou speakest truth.")
|
|
|