comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Linked resources and path management
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Linked resources and path management [message #57431 is a reply to message #57345] Fri, 07 December 2007 08:07 Go to previous message
Doug Edmundson is currently offline  Doug Edmundson
Messages: 58
Registered: November 2005
Member
b_gom@hotmail.com wrote:
> I've been trying to find a way to include parts of my large collection
> of IDL libraries as projects in the new Workbench, since including the
> full path bogs down my file server as a consequence of the new
> 'Analyzing Code' feature. Including each useful folder in my source
> tree as an individual project is not feasible.
>
> The 'linked resource' feature looked promising, since I could define a
> small number of projects, each with a subset of my source tree, and
> open them when required. The problem, though, is that the path for
> each 'linked resource' is added to !PATH when the project is opened,
> but they are never removed when the project is closed.
>
> Is this a feature or a bug? Is this usage of 'linked resources' kosher?

Hi Brad,

If you have a project's "Update IDL Path Preference" property turned on
and you close it, then the IDL Workbench will try and remove it from the
path. If it doesn't, then it could be a bug or the associated directory
was already on the path (was manually added). The workbench will only
remove one instance of a directory, not all occurrences.

From what I understand of your situation, the "linked resources"
approach seems the perfect way to go. Just to reiterate for the general
audience, if you have the IDL Workbench manage each project, then
closing currently unused projects will indeed help with the network
traffic situation (and reduce "analyzing code" if that's the main
concern). So in your case, the key to lowering network traffic is
indeed to limit the number of unneeded PRO files on the path. Pointing
to them with a project is fine, just close them when they're not needed.

Cheers,
Doug
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Writing a very large file
Next Topic: Re: Windows command-line: why not?

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 12:09:28 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.24018 seconds