| Re: New IDL 7.0 Project Problem [message #57964 is a reply to message #57824] |
Fri, 04 January 2008 10:15  |
![Paul Van Delst[1] is currently offline](theme/default/images/xoffline.png.pagespeed.ic.XRkd1fkXye.png "Paul Van Delst[1] is currently offline")
Paul Van Delst[1]
Messages: 1157
Registered: April 2002
|
Senior Member |
|
|
David Fanning wrote:
> Dave wrote:
>
>> I find out that IDL 7 is not a stable version. I still use IDL 6.4 and
>> not understand why ITTVIS use Ellipse. It's better IF there are two
>> environments, one for ellipse, one for trandtional way. I hope ITTVIS
>> put his forcus on the data analysis and visualization techniques.
>
> This is total BS. You might not care for Eclipse (not Ellipse),
> but IDL is NOT unstable.
I think there may be semantic or language issues with the OP's first sentence above. With
apologies to the OP if I'm wrong, but I assumed English is not his first language and
interpreted his use of the word "stable" accordingly; i.e. I took it to mean something
like: "the learning curve for the IDL Workbench is going to interrupt my usual work flow."[*]
But, the provisional misstatement should be corrected -- as you did (all guns blazing! For
this newsgroup at least :o) -- for the record. Any blame for the non-intuitivity (is that
a word?) of Eclipse shouldn't be laid at IDL's door.
cheers,
paulv
[*] To say nothing of the generational (decadal? annual?) differences in the definition of
"stable". :o)
|
|
|
|
comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Members
Search
Help
Login
Home
