comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » IDLdoc 3.0 released
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: IDLdoc 3.0 released [message #58233 is a reply to message #58156] Wed, 23 January 2008 11:27 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Michael Galloy is currently offline  Michael Galloy
Messages: 1114
Registered: April 2006
Senior Member
On Jan 23, 9:01 am, David Fanning <n...@dfanning.com> wrote:
> mgal...@gmail.com writes:
>> Use:
>
>>   IDL> idldoc, root=3Droot, output=3Doutput, format_style=3D'IDL'
>
>> The default FORMAT_STYLE is 'IDLdoc' to keep backward compatibility
>> with older versions.
>
> OK, better. But a great deal of the information seems to be
> missing. Especially the descriptions of the keywords and
> parameters. Do you suppose this is because of my overuse
> of white space? Could I write my own template to parse the
> kind of document headers I write?

The problem is the license and blank lines between the ";-" and the
"function aspect" line. Currently, IDLdoc associates the comment block
with the file, not the routine. So some of the blocks in it are
ignored. It is a current feature request to associate a file level
comment header in the IDL style with the last routine in the file.

The current workaround is to make sure that ;- and "function
aspect..." are adjacent, i.e. move the license to the beginning of the
file.

Mike
--
www.michaelgalloy.com
Tech-X Corporation
Software Developer II
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: SURFACE layout details
Next Topic: Re: Resampling from cumulative probability distribution

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sat Oct 11 14:31:54 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.09873 seconds