comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Lift the "ban" :-)
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Lift the "ban" :-) [message #5911] Wed, 13 March 1996 00:00
Tim Patterson is currently offline  Tim Patterson
Messages: 65
Registered: October 1995
Member
Sergey Senin wrote:
>
> As you know I'm a newcomer to this newsgroup, and if you feel like I'm wrong
> just disregard the article below.
>
> I'm aware that there is a "genlemen agreement" that neither VNI or RSI
> employees should post anything to this newsgroup. It's fair enough. What
> happens is that people asking the questions get replies from the experts by the
> e-mail and result is that we (users) are not benefiting from this. Isn't it
> time to lift the ban, as long as these articles are restricted to the
> discussion of technical issues and not virtues of either of the packadges?


But then why would anybody pay for the Technical Support option
offered by RSI if they could ask the same question for free here,
and get an answer from the RSI people? :)

Tim
Re: Lift the "ban" :-) [message #5917 is a reply to message #5911] Wed, 13 March 1996 00:00 Go to previous message
Sergei Senin is currently offline  Sergei Senin
Messages: 23
Registered: February 1996
Junior Member
todd@rainbow.rmii.com (Todd Bradley) wrote:

> The problem is that one man's technical issue is another man's
> marketing hype or slander.

Can't we sort of restrict participation of the employees of companies A and B
:-) to a certain area, say employees of company A or B can only answer
questions about products A or B respectively if this questions are from the
range "How do I do this or that?". We ( I say "we" because people from the both
companies claim that it is a "user-driven forum") can lift the ban for a month
or so and see what happens.

> Historically, employees of company A
> felt that just about every article posted by employees of company
> B were attempts at marketing or selling company B's product.

This is called paranoia, isn't it? :-)) ;-)) :-))

> And
> company A complained quite vigorously about this imagined breach
> of netiquette. Of course, something may have changed, but this
> has been an ongoing problem of this newsgroup since its inception.
>
> Todd.
> --
> Todd Bradley -- A7 Audio Research Lab -- todd@rmii.com
> Supreme Ruler of the Galaxy and Administrator of boulder.general


--
Sergei Senin
University of Portsmouth
Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Microwave, Telecommunications and Signal Processing Research Group
Anglesea Building, Anglesea Road,
Portsmouth,P01 3DJ,England.
ss@ee.port.ac.uk, http://www.ee.port.ac.uk:80/~ss-www/
Re: Lift the "ban" :-) [message #5919 is a reply to message #5911] Wed, 13 March 1996 00:00 Go to previous message
todd is currently offline  todd
Messages: 25
Registered: February 1994
Junior Member
Sergey Senin (ss@ee.port.ac.uk) wrote:
: [...] Isn't it
: time to lift the ban, as long as these articles are restricted to the
: discussion of technical issues and not virtues of either of the packadges?

The problem is that one man's technical issue is another man's
marketing hype or slander. Historically, employees of company A
felt that just about every article posted by employees of company
B were attempts at marketing or selling company B's product. And
company A complained quite vigorously about this imagined breach
of netiquette. Of course, something may have changed, but this
has been an ongoing problem of this newsgroup since its inception.

Todd.
--
Todd Bradley -- A7 Audio Research Lab -- todd@rmii.com
Supreme Ruler of the Galaxy and Administrator of boulder.general
Re: Lift the "ban" :-) [message #5923 is a reply to message #5911] Wed, 13 March 1996 00:00 Go to previous message
rarback is currently offline  rarback
Messages: 15
Registered: October 1992
Junior Member
In article <julien>, julien@cs.curtin.edu.au (Julien Flack) writes...
> sritcey@is.dal.ca (Stephen Ritcey) writes:
>
>> Sergei Senin:
>
>> : I'm aware that there is a "genlemen agreement" that neither VNI or RSI
>> : employees should post anything to this newsgroup.

>> The motion has a seconder. For an excellent example of how well this
>
> Count me in. Another example where this kind of expert input works well is

Just to be redundant, I also think it would useful if RSI people responded to
appropriate posts.
--Harvey
----
Harvey Rarback phone: (312)702-9931
CARS fax: (312)702-5454
University of Chicago Internet: rarback@cars3.uchicago.edu
5640 South Ellis Avenue "Make no little plans. They have no magic to
Chicago, IL 60637 stir men's souls."
  Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Previous Topic: Re: IDL for 3D image processing?
Next Topic: Re: hooking external 'C' functions to IDL

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 17:31:52 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00523 seconds