comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: GOES Follow-up Question
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: GOES Follow-up Question [message #59414] Tue, 18 March 2008 11:10
David Fanning is currently offline  David Fanning
Messages: 11724
Registered: August 2001
Senior Member
David Fanning writes:

> Clearly, the xscale and yscale values are wrong, since
> the tie point (the 2nd value) is in the right place.
>
> Why are they wrong?
>
> The one assumption I make that I cannot prove is
> that the corners of the warped image have the same
> lat/lon value as the corners of the unwarped GOES
> image and the same center. Is this assumption valid?
>
> If not, how can I determine the corner lat/lons of
> the warped image?

I might have known the one assumption I was making
would screw me up. But even then, IDL had more
curve balls to throw at me. :-(

OK, I needed to warp the latitude and longitude
arrays, in the same way I warped the image. I don't
know how to do this, other than to use MAP_PATCH,
so I tried that:

warp = Map_Patch(peruimage, peru_lon, peru_lat)
warp_lat = Map_Patch(peru_lat, peru_lon, peru_lat)
warp_lon = Map_Patch(peru_lon, peru_lon, peru_lat)

This worked OK, except for the fact that the first
column of warp_lat and warp_lon contain all zeros,
instead of values they were suppose to have. After
I extrapolated from columns 1 and 2, to fill in column
0, then I could calculate the latitude and longitude
corners of the warped image. They are NOT the same
as the latitude and longitude of the original image.

Original lat/lon corners
-99.3065 -19.4763
-98.1629 11.8074
-51.9875 11.8052
-50.8531 -19.4725

Warped lat/lon corners
-97.460799 -19.244392
-97.690084 12.663992
-52.490521 12.664713
-52.718553 -19.243647

Using the warped corners to produce the scale factor
and tie points in UV space, gave me a perfect fit
in the GeoTiff output.

I'll write an article, because no one should have to go
through this by themselves. :-(

Does anyone have ANY idea why the first column of
warped latitude and longitudes are screwed up? That's
sort hard to explain in an article.

Cheers,

David
--
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/
Sepore ma de ni thui. ("Perhaps thou speakest truth.")
  Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Previous Topic: GOES Follow-up Question
Next Topic: Particle_Trace question ?

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sat Oct 11 15:28:02 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 3.75887 seconds