comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Paths in the Workbench

Home » Public Forums » archive » Paths in the Workbench

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Paths in the Workbench [message #59567 is a reply to message #59471]

Mon, 31 March 2008 10:20

David Fanning
Messages: 11724
Registered: August 2001

Senior Member

> I have been trying to give it the benefit of the doubt. If I turn
> every feature off (which is pretty much what I have done), then the
> Workbench is a worse editor than the one in IDL 6.4 and with a memory
> footprint 10-12 times its previous size. Please tell me there are some
> redeeming features I've overlooked here. :-(

Of course, I could "build" my project, which works spectacularly
if I have been careful to write all my project programs as procedures.
But heaven help you if you thought you needed a function. There is
no way on God's green Earth you are even going to get *that* project
to
build correctly.

I see there is a provision for specifying your own custom build
command, but
I can't find hide nor hair of an example that would explain how you
might do so. :-(

Cheers (but not very cheery, this morning),

David

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Paths in the Workbench By: David Fanning on Mon, 31 March 2008 09:17
		Re: Paths in the Workbench By: David Fanning on Tue, 01 April 2008 10:48
		Re: Paths in the Workbench By: Michael Galloy on Tue, 01 April 2008 08:48
		Re: Paths in the Workbench By: David Fanning on Mon, 31 March 2008 20:49
		Re: Paths in the Workbench By: Kenneth P. Bowman on Mon, 31 March 2008 18:48
		Re: Paths in the Workbench By: David Fanning on Mon, 31 March 2008 16:19
		Re: Paths in the Workbench By: Vince Hradil on Mon, 31 March 2008 15:11
		Re: Paths in the Workbench By: David Fanning on Mon, 31 March 2008 14:51
		Re: Paths in the Workbench By: Vince Hradil on Mon, 31 March 2008 14:43
		Re: Paths in the Workbench By: David Fanning on Mon, 31 March 2008 13:59
		Re: Paths in the Workbench By: Michael Galloy on Mon, 31 March 2008 11:44
		Re: Paths in the Workbench By: David Fanning on Mon, 31 March 2008 11:25
		Re: Paths in the Workbench By: Paul Van Delst[1] on Mon, 31 March 2008 11:18
		Re: Paths in the Workbench By: David Fanning on Mon, 31 March 2008 10:20
		Re: Paths in the Workbench By: David Fanning on Mon, 31 March 2008 10:03
		Re: Paths in the Workbench By: Michael Galloy on Mon, 31 March 2008 09:22

Previous Topic:	Re: Why do variables become "undefined" after some error?
Next Topic:	Re: Coyote's Guide Sold to MathWorks

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sun Nov 30 15:13:30 PST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.31641 seconds