comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Why Persist with the IDL Workbench

Home » Public Forums » archive » Why Persist with the IDL Workbench

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Why Persist with the IDL Workbench [message #59619 is a reply to message #59523]

Tue, 01 April 2008 13:09

David Fanning
Messages: 11724
Registered: August 2001

Senior Member

Paul van Delst writes:

> From what I understand, emacs does that quite well also (I've seen
> people do things editing ruby source in emacs that blew me away)

EMACS is kind of like those women in the magazines
Coyote is always reading. Very nice. But it just
ain't gonna happen for me in this lifetime. Praying
for reincarnation is about the only hope I have left.

So, really, the only question worth asking is,
"Compared to what alternative?" And I'm just saying,
compared to what I've been using for nearly 20
wasted years, it's not too bad. :-)

Cheers,

David
--
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/
Sepore ma de ni thui. ("Perhaps thou speakest truth.")

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Why Persist with the IDL Workbench By: David Fanning on Tue, 01 April 2008 12:17
		Re: Why Persist with the IDL Workbench By: bjelley on Wed, 02 April 2008 06:49
		Re: Why Persist with the IDL Workbench By: Matt[2] on Tue, 01 April 2008 14:13
		Re: Why Persist with the IDL Workbench By: Michael Galloy on Tue, 01 April 2008 13:56
		Re: Why Persist with the IDL Workbench By: David Fanning on Tue, 01 April 2008 13:09
		Re: Why Persist with the IDL Workbench By: Paul Van Delst[1] on Tue, 01 April 2008 12:50

Previous Topic:	Coyote's Guide Sold to MathWorks
Next Topic:	Re: Widget Event_Pro question

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sat Oct 11 06:02:42 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.56191 seconds