comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Wave structure/list/asarr nesting levels - not infinite?
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Wave structure/list/asarr nesting levels - not infinite? [message #5964] Thu, 21 March 1996 00:00
Sergei Senin is currently offline  Sergei Senin
Messages: 23
Registered: February 1996
Junior Member
Sergey Senin <ss@ee.port.ac.uk> wrote:
> Bruce E Thomason <brucet@hsonline.net> wrote:
>> Bruce E Thomason wrote:
>>> Questions are:
>>> 0. Can anyone elucidate on what the data structure nesting limitations
>>> are for Wave 6.0?
>>> 1. Is this a W'95/Beta issue only?
>>> 2. Are there ways (system variables?) to get around a limited nesting
>>> depth?
>>> 3. Any other suggestions? (Kind ones please!)
>>
>> To follow up on my own posting: VNI reports that this is indeed a bug,
>> which effects both Windows and Unix product versions.
>
> What happens if you put a loop inside a procedure?
>
> -------loop 1----------
> -------loop 2-------
> .
> .
> loop_n.pro with loop n in it
> .
> .
> --------------------
> ------------------------

Oops, sorry, I was a bit unclear - what I meant is ,is there a limitation on the
nesting *loops* as well as on structure/list/ nesting levels?


--
Sergei Senin
University of Portsmouth
Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Microwave, Telecommunications and Signal Processing Research Group
Anglesea Building, Anglesea Road,
Portsmouth,P01 3DJ,England.
ss@ee.port.ac.uk, http://www.ee.port.ac.uk:80/~ss-www/
Re: Wave structure/list/asarr nesting levels - not infinite? [message #5966 is a reply to message #5964] Thu, 21 March 1996 00:00 Go to previous message
Sergei Senin is currently offline  Sergei Senin
Messages: 23
Registered: February 1996
Junior Member
Bruce E Thomason <brucet@hsonline.net> wrote:
> Bruce E Thomason wrote:
>> Questions are:
>> 0. Can anyone elucidate on what the data structure nesting limitations
>> are for Wave 6.0?
>> 1. Is this a W'95/Beta issue only?
>> 2. Are there ways (system variables?) to get around a limited nesting
>> depth?
>> 3. Any other suggestions? (Kind ones please!)
>
> To follow up on my own posting: VNI reports that this is indeed a bug,
> which effects both Windows and Unix product versions.

What happens if you put a loop inside a procedure?

-------loop 1----------
-------loop 2-------
.
.
loop_n.pro with loop n in it
.
.
--------------------
------------------------


--
Sergei Senin
University of Portsmouth
Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Microwave, Telecommunications and Signal Processing Research Group
Anglesea Building, Anglesea Road,
Portsmouth,P01 3DJ,England.
ss@ee.port.ac.uk, http://www.ee.port.ac.uk:80/~ss-www/
Re: Wave structure/list/asarr nesting levels - not infinite? [message #5972 is a reply to message #5964] Wed, 20 March 1996 00:00 Go to previous message
Bruce E Thomason is currently offline  Bruce E Thomason
Messages: 6
Registered: March 1996
Junior Member
Bruce E Thomason wrote:
> Questions are:
> 0. Can anyone elucidate on what the data structure nesting limitations
> are for Wave 6.0?
> 1. Is this a W'95/Beta issue only?
> 2. Are there ways (system variables?) to get around a limited nesting
> depth?
> 3. Any other suggestions? (Kind ones please!)

To follow up on my own posting: VNI reports that this is indeed a bug,
which effects both Windows and Unix product versions.

{Hmph!}
/~~~~~\....:
{(o)-(o)}
----------------------------------OOo----(_)----oOO--------- ---------
Dynamic System Solutions Real-Time System Developers
331 Franklin St. Specializing In QNX Applications
Columbus, IN 47201 For Test And Measurement
  Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Previous Topic: PV-WAVE Web Site
Next Topic: DICOM Input/Output Procedures for IDL?

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 16:51:48 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00588 seconds