comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » direct graphics or object graphics ?
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: direct graphics or object graphics ? [message #60312 is a reply to message #60172] Tue, 06 May 2008 13:53 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
natha is currently offline  natha
Messages: 482
Registered: October 2007
Senior Member
On May 6, 4:39 pm, Jean H <jghas...@DELTHIS.ucalgary.ANDTHIS.ca>
wrote:
> nata wrote:
>> But,
>
>> There are any problems with virtual memory when I've more than 1000
>> IDLgrPlots and I want to draw my View?
>
> don't you want to draw one after another, and to save your plots as
> image file? ... or at least to close them after viewing them? ... I
> doubt anyone has a brain large enough to capture, remember, analyze and
> correlate to your original data that many plots at once!
>
> Jean


This is not the problem,

Drawing all the plots is a good idea for analyse the data.
The problem is the virtual memory used for draw all of these in the
same IDLgrWindow...

In Direct Graphics the memory used for OPLOT data is "almost nothing".
If I try the same using object graphics the time for draw the View
increases very much.
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: extract lat/lon from MOD13Q1
Next Topic: Hierarchical Splitting of images based on texture

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sat Oct 11 03:07:10 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.24408 seconds