comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: pState structure without widgets?

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: pState structure without widgets?

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: pState structure without widgets? [message #60378]

Wed, 14 May 2008 15:58

Robbie
Messages: 165
Registered: February 2006

Senior Member

I have resorted to writing "widget methods" which take the first
argument as the pState. For example:

mywidget_build, pState
mywidget_show, pState

I used pass around the widget id, until I encountered issues when
attempting to unpack the UVALUE twice. To be completely safe, pState
should be a pointer to a structure. By the time you've done everything
the *right* way, you might as well just use objects.

Compare the syntax of these two statements

data = *(*pState).pData

data = *self.pData

Which statement makes more sense to you?

Robbie

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: pState structure without widgets? By: Robbie on Wed, 14 May 2008 15:58
		Re: pState structure without widgets? By: Gianluca Li Causi on Tue, 13 May 2008 08:32
		Re: pState structure without widgets? By: David Fanning on Tue, 13 May 2008 07:48

Previous Topic:	Re: how to "check" checkbox state?
Next Topic:	strange behaviour of .skip command

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 16:05:52 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.23991 seconds