comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: matrix division

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: matrix division [message #60426 is a reply to message #60425]

Thu, 22 May 2008 05:40

d.poreh
Messages: 406
Registered: October 2007

Senior Member

On May 22, 2:29 pm, David Fanning <n...@dfanning.com> wrote:
> d.po...@gmail.com writes:
>> b>eps??? but 0<eps!!!!!!
>
> Lo siento. Habla Ingles?
>
> Cheers,
>
> David
> --
> David Fanning, Ph.D.
> Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
> Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming:http://www.dfanning.com/
> Sepore ma de ni thui. ("Perhaps thou speakest truth.")

Sorry!!! Yes as you mentioned above b> eps but 0<eps. Doesn’t it? I
mean how we can reach something like b/0=b/eps???
Cheers

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: matrix division By: David Fanning on Thu, 22 May 2008 05:59
		Re: matrix division By: David Fanning on Thu, 22 May 2008 05:55
		Re: matrix division By: jameskuyper on Thu, 22 May 2008 05:47
		Re: matrix division By: jameskuyper on Thu, 22 May 2008 05:42
		Re: matrix division By: d.poreh on Thu, 22 May 2008 05:40
		Re: matrix division By: David Fanning on Thu, 22 May 2008 05:29
		Re: matrix division By: d.poreh on Thu, 22 May 2008 05:24
		Re: matrix division By: David Fanning on Thu, 22 May 2008 05:13
		Re: matrix division By: David Fanning on Thu, 22 May 2008 05:08
		Re: matrix division By: adam.ranson on Thu, 22 May 2008 04:41
		Re: matrix division By: d.poreh on Thu, 22 May 2008 03:07
		Re: matrix division By: Nigel Wade on Thu, 22 May 2008 03:00
		Re: matrix division By: adam.ranson on Thu, 22 May 2008 01:07
		Re: matrix division By: David Fanning on Wed, 21 May 2008 11:35
		Re: matrix division By: jameskuyper on Thu, 22 May 2008 07:57

Previous Topic:	plotting graphics for web pages
Next Topic:	Re: interact with iimage from the command line?

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sat Nov 29 18:18:14 PST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.12536 seconds