comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: matrix division

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: matrix division [message #60434 is a reply to message #60433]

Thu, 22 May 2008 03:00

Nigel Wade
Messages: 286
Registered: March 1998

Senior Member

adam.ranson@bris.ac.uk wrote:

>
> Thanks for the quick response David! This is the way I'd
> assumed it would be done but doesn't give me the numbers
> back I'd expect. For example:
>
> I = [[1, 2, 2],[2,1,1]]
> C = [[8, 2, 8],[2,8,1]]
> Z = I/C
>
> IDL> print, z gives...
> 0 1 0
> 1 0 1
>
> I want to divide 1 by 8, 2 by 2, 2 by 8, 2 by 2, 1 by 8 & 1 by 1.

You have done.

But maybe what you really want to do is divide 1.0 by 8.0, etc...

--
Nigel Wade

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: matrix division By: David Fanning on Thu, 22 May 2008 05:59
		Re: matrix division By: David Fanning on Thu, 22 May 2008 05:55
		Re: matrix division By: jameskuyper on Thu, 22 May 2008 05:47
		Re: matrix division By: jameskuyper on Thu, 22 May 2008 05:42
		Re: matrix division By: d.poreh on Thu, 22 May 2008 05:40
		Re: matrix division By: David Fanning on Thu, 22 May 2008 05:29
		Re: matrix division By: d.poreh on Thu, 22 May 2008 05:24
		Re: matrix division By: David Fanning on Thu, 22 May 2008 05:13
		Re: matrix division By: David Fanning on Thu, 22 May 2008 05:08
		Re: matrix division By: adam.ranson on Thu, 22 May 2008 04:41
		Re: matrix division By: d.poreh on Thu, 22 May 2008 03:07
		Re: matrix division By: Nigel Wade on Thu, 22 May 2008 03:00
		Re: matrix division By: adam.ranson on Thu, 22 May 2008 01:07
		Re: matrix division By: David Fanning on Wed, 21 May 2008 11:35
		Re: matrix division By: jameskuyper on Thu, 22 May 2008 07:57

Previous Topic:	plotting graphics for web pages
Next Topic:	Re: interact with iimage from the command line?

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sat Nov 29 05:54:19 PST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.64067 seconds