comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Problem with MJ2 extension
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Problem with MJ2 extension [message #60533] Sun, 25 May 2008 16:06 Go to next message
Mark[1] is currently offline  Mark[1]
Messages: 66
Registered: February 2008
Member
On May 24, 4:16 pm, tarequea...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hello IDL gurus,
>
> I am having some trouble regarding '.mj2' extension. I have couple of
> '.gif' files and by using IDLffMJPEG2000
> I can get some nice animation. But the fun just ends there.I need to
> have these on a more 'portable' formats as in : avi,mpeg,mov etc. A
> little searching on the net did not bring anything home.
>
> I was hoping to get some pointers on how to convert these mj2's avi/
> mpeg/ mov etc.

For now, writing MJPEG-2000 animations is a waste of time because
there's very little software to play the file or convert it to
something else. You're better off writing from IDL straight to the
format you want. There's some discussion on this right now on a thread
entitled "animated png: a new format for scientific animations".

In addition to being poorly supported, MJPEG-2000 suffers another
limitation that makes it not very good for scientific animations: it
fails to make any use of inter-frame compression methods. This means
the files are much larger than they need to be.
Re: Problem with MJ2 extension [message #60665 is a reply to message #60533] Tue, 27 May 2008 15:00 Go to previous message
tarequeaziz is currently offline  tarequeaziz
Messages: 20
Registered: November 2007
Junior Member
On May 25, 7:06 pm, Mark <mark.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 24, 4:16 pm, tarequea...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> Hello IDL gurus,
>
>> I am having some trouble regarding '.mj2' extension. I have couple of
>> '.gif' files and by using IDLffMJPEG2000
>> I can get some nice animation. But the fun just ends there.I need to
>> have these on a more 'portable' formats as in : avi,mpeg,mov etc. A
>> little searching on the net did not bring anything home.
>
>> I was hoping to get some pointers on how to convert these mj2's avi/
>> mpeg/ mov etc.
>
> For now, writing MJPEG-2000 animations is a waste of time because
> there's very little software to play the file or convert it to
> something else. You're better off writing from IDL straight to the
> format you want. There's some discussion on this right now on a thread
> entitled "animated png: a new format for scientific animations".
>
> In addition to being poorly supported, MJPEG-2000 suffers another
> limitation that makes it not very good for scientific animations: it
> fails to make any use of inter-frame compression methods. This means
> the files are much larger than they need to be.

Mark, thanks a lot for the suggestion....!!!
Re: Problem with MJ2 extension [message #60669 is a reply to message #60533] Tue, 27 May 2008 06:58 Go to previous message
wgallery is currently offline  wgallery
Messages: 32
Registered: December 1998
Member
On May 25, 7:06 pm, Mark <mark.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 24, 4:16 pm, tarequea...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> Hello IDL gurus,
>
>> I am having some trouble regarding '.mj2' extension. I have couple of
>> '.gif' files and by using IDLffMJPEG2000
>> I can get some nice animation. But the fun just ends there.I need to
>> have these on a more 'portable' formats as in : avi,mpeg,mov etc. A
>> little searching on the net did not bring anything home.
>
>> I was hoping to get some pointers on how to convert these mj2's avi/
>> mpeg/ mov etc.
>
> For now, writing MJPEG-2000 animations is a waste of time because
> there's very little software to play the file or convert it to
> something else. You're better off writing from IDL straight to the
> format you want. There's some discussion on this right now on a thread
> entitled "animated png: a new format for scientific animations".
>
> In addition to being poorly supported, MJPEG-2000 suffers another
> limitation that makes it not very good for scientific animations: it
> fails to make any use of inter-frame compression methods. This means
> the files are much larger than they need to be.

FYI:

MJPEG-2000 files can be played on MS Media Player if you install the M-
JPEG codec V3 from Morgan Multimedia

http://www.morgan-multimedia.com/index.htm

Note: it says that this is a trial version that expires Oct, 2007, but
it still runs after popping a reminder window.

Bill Gallery
Atmospheric and Environmental Research, Inc.
Lexington, MA
Re: Problem with MJ2 extension [message #60670 is a reply to message #60533] Tue, 27 May 2008 05:14 Go to previous message
Haje Korth is currently offline  Haje Korth
Messages: 651
Registered: May 1997
Senior Member
I agree that the MJ2 format is still poorly supported. But the fact that no
inter-frame compression is used is THE advantage of the format. This way
each image accurately represents the underlying scientific dataset and
individual images are not smeared by the codec algortihm. It is accuracy
that matters, not file size!

Haje


"Mark" <mark.hadf@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:f8abc45e-0628-4f6a-96d7-a35715f5c63a@v26g2000prm.google groups.com...
> On May 24, 4:16 pm, tarequea...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Hello IDL gurus,
>>
>> I am having some trouble regarding '.mj2' extension. I have couple of
>> '.gif' files and by using IDLffMJPEG2000
>> I can get some nice animation. But the fun just ends there.I need to
>> have these on a more 'portable' formats as in : avi,mpeg,mov etc. A
>> little searching on the net did not bring anything home.
>>
>> I was hoping to get some pointers on how to convert these mj2's avi/
>> mpeg/ mov etc.
>
> For now, writing MJPEG-2000 animations is a waste of time because
> there's very little software to play the file or convert it to
> something else. You're better off writing from IDL straight to the
> format you want. There's some discussion on this right now on a thread
> entitled "animated png: a new format for scientific animations".
>
> In addition to being poorly supported, MJPEG-2000 suffers another
> limitation that makes it not very good for scientific animations: it
> fails to make any use of inter-frame compression methods. This means
> the files are much larger than they need to be.
>
  Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Previous Topic: Re: anyone has "indgen_array.pro"?
Next Topic: fast convolving question

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 15:11:33 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00771 seconds