| Re: TIME_TEST results for Pentium Pro 200 [message #6155] |
Wed, 08 May 1996 00:00 |
rfinch
Messages: 51
Registered: March 1991
|
Member |
|
|
Hmmm....Here's the results from a Sparc 20, 75 MHz, 2 CPU's, 64MB
memory, Solaris 2.4. I ran it rlogged in, displayed results on Sparc
2. Just the usual many background tasks running on the Sparcs when
doing the tests.
Test# TIME_TEST TIME_TEST2 GRAPHICS_TIMES GRAPHICS_TIMES2
1 0.815477 1.60147 0.195409 0.195650
2 0.806830 0.800187 0.469878 1.63318
3 0.619252 0.645319 0.261785 1.33611
4 0.628185 0.629920 3.88605 3.76087
5 0.855981 0.873598
6 0.0793949 0.772158
7 0.173250 0.861738
8 0.248987 0.721901
9 0.394001 1.21226
10 0.387189 1.16281
11 0.540210 1.67365
12 0.185285 0.744352
13 1.04374 0.629388
14 0.0640700 0.549958
15 0.00571597 1.05545
16 1.87994 0.0644650
17 0.247098 0.00574791
18 2.05552 1.89511
19 0.0231190 0.239590
20 0.170733 1.28278
21 0.107418 1.08317
22 0.0890019 0.180416
23 0.404788 16.9105
Total 11.8252 35.5960 4.81312 6.92581
G-mean 0.2668 0.6700 0.55283 1.12566
> Total 4.704 11.736 1.250 4.250
> G-mean 0.149 0.292 0.310 0.735
> The system is a Micron Pro Magnun Plus (B) with a 200MHz Pentium Pro CPU,
> 64MB (non-EDO) ram running Win NT 3.51. The graphics subsystem is a Diamond
> Stealth 64 PCI w 2MB VRAM
Conclusion: The 686 seems about 3 times as fast as the Sparc 20. Given
that I expect an UltraSparc to be also 3 times as fast as our Sparc
20, that would certainly give the nod to the 686 for
price/performance. I wonder how the 686 would do running Solaris.
--
Ralph Finch, Senior Engineer, W.R. Tel. 916-653-8268
Delta Modeling Section Fax. 916-653-6077
Dept. of Water Resources Email rfinch@water.ca.gov
1416 Ninth St, Sacramento, CA 95814 finger for PGP public key
|
|
|
|
comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Members
Search
Help
Login
Home
