comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » TIME_TEST results for Pentium Pro 200

Home » Public Forums » archive » TIME_TEST results for Pentium Pro 200

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

TIME_TEST results for Pentium Pro 200 [message #6157]

Wed, 08 May 1996 00:00

zawodny
Messages: 121
Registered: August 1992

Senior Member

Hi,

Awhile back I mentioned that I'd be getting a P-Pro 200 and would
post the results from TIME_TEST. Well, here they are, but first some info.
The system is a Micron Pro Magnun Plus (B) with a 200MHz Pentium Pro CPU,
64MB (non-EDO) ram running Win NT 3.51. The graphics subsystem is a Diamond
Stealth 64 PCI w 2MB VRAM This is a brand new clean system with no other
applications installed, let alone running. There were no other users on
the system.

Test# TIME_TEST TIME_TEST2 GRAPHICS_TIMES GRAPHICS_TIMES2
1 0.141 0.297 0.328 0.312
2 0.281 0.266 0.265 1.016
3 0.219 0.234 0.297 2.562
4 0.219 0.219 0.360 0.360
5 0.172 0.172
6 0.141 1.516
7 0.156 0.781
8 0.203 0.563
9 0.406 1.204
10 0.375 1.125
11 0.485 1.437
12 0.047 0.109
13 0.203 0.141
14 0.031 0.031
15 0.016 0.203
16 0.453 0.031
17 0.141 0.032
18 0.437 0.453
19 0.031 0.125
20 0.094 1.375
21 0.078 0.687
22 0.109 0.219
23 0.266 0.516

Total 4.704 11.736 1.250 4.250
G-mean 0.149 0.292 0.310 0.735

I had to run TIME_TEST a few times before I got a non-zero time for test 15.
Needless to say, I am very pleased with these numbers which are about twice
as fast as my Dec Alpha 3000 Model 600 (175MHz CPU).

--
Work: Dr. Joseph M. Zawodny Play: Joe Zawodny
NASA Langley Research Center KO4LW@amsat.org
E-mail: J.M.Zawodny@LaRC.NASA.gov zawodny@exis.net

Report message to a moderator

Re: TIME_TEST results for Pentium Pro 200 [message #6250 is a reply to message #6157]

Mon, 13 May 1996 00:00

craig stevens
Messages: 7
Registered: May 1996

Junior Member

Ralph Finch wrote:

[............deleted...]

> Conclusion: The 686 seems about 3 times as fast as the Sparc 20. Given
> that I expect an UltraSparc to be also 3 times as fast as our Sparc
> 20, that would certainly give the nod to the 686 for
> price/performance. I wonder how the 686 would do running Solaris.
> --

can someone post time_test for LINUX OS of comparable
hardware? thanks

craig

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic:	Pie_plot.pro
Next Topic:	TIME_TEST results for 7500/100 Macintosh

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 11:41:16 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00663 seconds