comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Weiler Atherton Clipping Algorithm
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Weiler Atherton Clipping Algorithm [message #62447 is a reply to message #62445] Tue, 09 September 2008 09:03 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
rogass is currently offline  rogass
Messages: 200
Registered: April 2008
Senior Member
Yes, a native implementation would be the best. Unfortunately, there
is still no solution. I have polygones with hundreds of vertices and
now it's time for me to decide how to handle this. I tried Mati Merons
Shape_overlap algorithm based on the Sutherland approach, which is
fast enough, but Mati's version gives me the wrong results.

The c-Version from JD - I don't really know how to implement this in
my program. Is there are a ready-to-use part, which can be directly
used within IDL?

Isn't there any other algorithm which can handle clipping of difficult
and concave polygones? I can't understand this, really! In my opinion,
it is a basic task in image processing. I have written a very complex
computation and the last step would be the comparison of the
polygones. Now, missing implementations of those algorithms hinder me
to fulfill my task.... It's very annoying...

Maybe, someone has written another polygon clipping algorithm to
handle the problems with concave and complex polygones? Maybe, someone
is able to give me a hint or where I could start?

Please, excuse my English, I'm not a native speaker.

Thanks and best regards

Chris
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: Changing WIDGET_BUTTON behaviour
Next Topic: problem with online help IDL v7.0

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sat Oct 11 15:37:27 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 7.92103 seconds