comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: large matrix operations
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: large matrix operations [message #62872] Tue, 14 October 2008 06:10 Go to previous message
Vince Hradil is currently offline  Vince Hradil
Messages: 574
Registered: December 1999
Senior Member
On Oct 13, 5:14 pm, "mgal...@gmail.com" <mgal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Oct 13, 3:17 pm, Vince Hradil <vincehra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for cleaning that up.  I think the conclusions are the same -
>> matrix_multiply does not speed things up.  I wonder what happens if we
>> really push the envelope wrt RAM and matrix size.  Unfortunately, I
>> don't have a lot of time to play with this.
>
> MATRIX_MULTIPLY is about 15% faster in my tests, but I guess you were
> wanting a *very* significant speedup i.e. like the speedup you get
> when vectorizing code?
>
> Mike
> --www.michaelgalloy.com
> Tech-X Corporation
> Software Developer II

Yeah- I guess if you're doing a lot of these and each one can be 15%
faster then you might gain something. I was really expecting
(hoping?) MATRIX_MULTIPLY to be 50% or better faster. Besides, if my
programs run too fast how can I justify my salary? 8^)

I'm reminded of this: http://xkcd.com/303/
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: multislice
Next Topic: Catalyst Library Going Open Source

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sun Oct 12 13:05:53 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.36036 seconds