comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: Can I do this without using loops?

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Can I do this without using loops?

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Can I do this without using loops? [message #6308 is a reply to message #6301]

Thu, 06 June 1996 00:00

Bruce E Thomason
Messages: 6
Registered: March 1996

Junior Member

Re: Finding larger of pixel set.

try:

x = image_1
y = image_2

bigger_of_x_y = x > y

or

bigger_of_x_y = y > x

This seems to work in Wave - not sure about IDL.

Cheers - Bruce

--
{!}
/~~~~~\....:
{(o)-(o)}
----------------------------------OOo----(_)----oOO--------- ---------
Dynamic System Solutions Real-Time System Developers
331 Franklin St. Specializing In Test & Measurement &
Columbus, IN 47201 Scientific Visualization

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: Can I do this without using loops? By: bowman on Sat, 08 June 1996 00:00
		Re: Can I do this without using loops? By: santanu on Sat, 08 June 1996 00:00
		Re: Can I do this without using loops? By: Bruce E Thomason on Thu, 06 June 1996 00:00
		Re: Can I do this without using loops? By: rivers on Wed, 05 June 1996 00:00
		Re: Can I do this without using loops? By: peter on Wed, 05 June 1996 00:00

Previous Topic:	Re: Call_External and the C Math Library
Next Topic:	Re: another composite image question

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sat Oct 11 10:26:30 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.98863 seconds