comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: Cleaver 2d reverse indicies?

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Cleaver 2d reverse indicies?

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Cleaver 2d reverse indicies? [message #63300 is a reply to message #63297]

Mon, 03 November 2008 16:40

Chris[6]
Messages: 84
Registered: July 2008

Member

On Nov 3, 11:26 am, Brian Larsen <balar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Chris,
>
> This works like a charm and is noticeably faster (~1.5 times). Gotta
> love this usenet group.
>
> Thanks much.
>
> Say you were to move to 3d (or 4d) does this extend in the same manner
> with just one total loop or can you just kill one? Brain is a bit
> slow on this today (it is Monday after all).
>
> Brian
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------ --------------
> Brian Larsen
> Boston University
> Center for Space Physicshttp://people.bu.edu/balarsen/Home/IDL

Yes, I think one loop through all of the indices is always possible.

In fact, come to think of it, you don't even need to do the
transformation. IDL just converts array[x,y,z] back into array[i]
anyways - this could save some extra time.

chris

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: Cleaver 2d reverse indicies? By: Jeremy Bailin on Tue, 04 November 2008 07:48
		Re: Cleaver 2d reverse indicies? By: Chris[6] on Tue, 04 November 2008 01:56
		Re: Cleaver 2d reverse indicies? By: Chris[6] on Mon, 03 November 2008 16:40
		Re: Cleaver 2d reverse indicies? By: Brian Larsen on Mon, 03 November 2008 13:26
		Re: Cleaver 2d reverse indicies? By: Chris[6] on Mon, 03 November 2008 13:15

Previous Topic:	IDL hilbert() function
Next Topic:	google code search

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Thu Oct 09 18:54:48 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.23981 seconds