comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: Numerical Recipes diffs?

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Numerical Recipes diffs?

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Numerical Recipes diffs? [message #6355]

Fri, 21 June 1996 00:00

kachun
Messages: 7
Registered: June 1996

Junior Member

In article <4qchu0$2qc@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu> kspencer@s.psych.uiuc.edu (Kevin Spencer) writes:
> kachun@bogart.Colorado.EDU (Ka Chun Yu) writes:
>
>> I've now tested the IDL3 and IDL4 equivalents of the above routines
>> with the same inputs, and both routines give different results in
>> the two IDL versions.
>
> One possible reason for the different results is that the new routines
> take row-major arrays, not column-major. (I might have just switched
> these two -- anyway, the new routines take the transpose of the old
> format.) All the differences are described in the on-line help.

Yes! That was the problem. One could either enter in the transpose
of the input matrixes, or for some functions, specify the COLUMN key-
word to use column-major input. Thanks to all those who helped.

> Kevin
--
--kachun +** Center for Astrophysics and Space Astronomy **+
+** University of Colorado, Boulder **+
+** Email: kachun@casa.colorado.edu **+
+** http://casa.colorado.edu/~kachun **+

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: Numerical Recipes diffs? By: kachun on Fri, 21 June 1996 00:00
		Re: Numerical Recipes diffs? By: kspencer on Thu, 20 June 1996 00:00
		Re: Numerical Recipes diffs? By: kachun on Thu, 20 June 1996 00:00
		Re: Numerical Recipes diffs? By: marq on Thu, 20 June 1996 00:00

Previous Topic:	Re: Curve fitting an exponential with PV-Wave
Next Topic:	time_test on various platforms

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 03:41:33 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.60048 seconds