comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Different sized pixels in pg_plotimage (is this a "feature")
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Different sized pixels in pg_plotimage (is this a "feature") [message #64771] Tue, 20 January 2009 12:03 Go to previous message
pgrigis is currently offline  pgrigis
Messages: 436
Registered: September 2007
Senior Member
Paolo wrote:
> Craig Markwardt wrote:
>> On Jan 20, 9:00�am, Brian Larsen <balar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Liam,
>>>
>>> thanks this is another great solution to this.
>>>
>>> I find it infinitely interesting how different people approach
>>> problems. �There are inherent "betters" and "worses" with each way
>>> based much on the approach and the particulars of the problem it was
>>> intended for.
>>>
>>> pg_plotimage has the advantage of specifying img, x, y so it does the
>>> axes for you and will scale the pixels log etc but doesnt provide a
>>> clean way to set the zrange (color range), and has some 1/2 pixel
>>> things that are more or less worked out now
>>>
>>> imdisp has the advantage of being a very clean way to display an image
>>> but the user has to specify the axes themselfs, which is often a good
>>> thing. �The zrange capability works easy also, but log scaling isnt
>>> obvious in x and y
>>
>> ...
>>
>> And it's strange to see PG_PLOTIMAGE, since PLOTIMAGE has been doing
>> the same thing for close to a decade.... :-) (with image intensity
>> scaling, axes, standard graphics keywords, pan and zoom, the works).
>
> Hi Craig,
>
> the one and only reason I wrote pg_plotimage was log-scaling in y for
> spectrograms
> (but it was a good learning experience too;-) ).

The time, of course, would have better been spent
by building an improved google news-reader/writer
that doesn't mangle posts so much and uses fixed-width
fonts ;-)

Ciao,
Paolo


>
> There are solarsoft routines that do it, but they are not stand-alone
> and are a bit
> more tricky to fine-tune. But that's where I stole the main ideas ;-)
>
> But the fact that several different versions of programs with similar
> functionality
> exists does point out to a deficency of IDL bult-ins, and is a mistery
> for me why
> such basics stuff has never been implemented by ITT.
>
> Ciao,
> Paolo
>
>>
>> Craig
>>
>> Available from my web page...
>> http://www.physics.wisc.edu/~craigm/idl/graphics.html
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: stop oddity
Next Topic: Image Inpainting

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 18:19:22 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00214 seconds