comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: IDL_IDLBridge Issue
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: IDL_IDLBridge Issue [message #64777] Tue, 20 January 2009 07:50
Jean H. is currently offline  Jean H.
Messages: 472
Registered: July 2006
Senior Member
jakeproctor@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a piece of code that uses numerous IDL_IDLBridge objects to
> perform operations in parallel. These processes generally open a
> binary file, process the data from this file, and write new files
> containing text and/or images generated from the processing. All of
> this works well using IDL 6.3. I am attempting to upgrade to IDL 6.4
> or IDL 7.0 and I am finding that my software is very unstable using
> the newer versions of IDL. After running for awhile, and executing
> numerous IDL_IDLBridge objects succesfully, the software randomly dies
> and the only message I receive is the word "Abort" at my console. I
> have tried this on both Solaris 9 and Solaris 10.
>
> Based on this general description of my problem, I am curious if
> anyone else has noticed issues with the IDL_IDLBridge when upgrading
> from IDL 6.3 to a new version of IDL?
>
> Thanks!
>
> -- Jake

Jake,

I haven't noticed these type of behaviors, though I am under Windows for
now. Same code runs fine under 6.3, 6.4 and 7. With v7 though, it acts
more or less randomly when you press ctrl+c ... sometimes it stops the
main process, sometimes it stops the 2nd process.

Don't forget to set a log for bridges, so you may get an idea of what is
happening inside!

Jean
  Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Previous Topic: Re: OT: land-sea mask
Next Topic: stop oddity

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 17:46:27 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00562 seconds