comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: BYTSCL bug!?
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: BYTSCL bug!? [message #65440] Wed, 04 March 2009 07:30 Go to previous message
spidersapiens is currently offline  spidersapiens
Messages: 6
Registered: June 2006
Junior Member
On Mar 4, 6:35 am, Bennett <juggernau...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mar 3, 5:14 pm, David Fanning <n...@dfanning.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>> Michael Galloy writes:
>>> I would contact support, I'm not sure anyone reads the forums.
>
>> I don't know why, but what flashed into my mind
>> when I read this was that wonderful haiku poem
>> of Issa's;
>
>>   Children imitating cormorants
>>   Are even more wonderful than cormorants.
>
>> Although it went though my head like this.
>
>>   Snarks without emoticons
>>   Are even more wonderful than emoticons.
>
>> Cheers,
>
>> David
>> --
>> David Fanning, Ph.D.
>> Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming (www.dfanning.com)
>> Sepore ma de ni thui. ("Perhaps thou speakest truth.")
>
> Maybe they very well meant this...
> IDL> print, (2+1)*(((9065-4124)-1)/(18946-4124))
>        0
> Put the parentheses in the wrong place and you'll get different
> arithmetic. So it would be either wrong documentation or wrong
> implementation.  Bad either way.

Bennett,

That's a good guess. Thanks! I just tried that. Unfortunately, it's
still not matching the result from BYTSCL on my dataset.

Mingming
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: XPlot3D isotropic keyword?
Next Topic: spawn (with bi-directional pipes) on windows

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 09:41:09 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.56218 seconds