comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: IDL question about IMSL_NLINLSQ
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: IDL question about IMSL_NLINLSQ [message #67459] Wed, 22 July 2009 03:57
wy is currently offline  wy
Messages: 2
Registered: July 2009
Junior Member
On 7月22日, 下午5时21分, wy <wangy...@sina.com> wrote:
> I'm using IMSL_NLINLSQ to solve nonlinear equations right now. I've
> got results utilizing argument like "MAX_STEP=0.01,TOL_AFCN=0.01", but
> I have an prompt as below:
>
> "IMSL Error: IMSL_NLINLSQ: Warning: MATH_UNBOUNDED: Five consecutive
> steps of length "MAX_STEP" have been taken; either the function is
> unbounded below, or has a finite asymptote in some direction or the
> maximum allowable step size "MAX_STEP" is too small."
>
> I changed the arguments to be more sensitive seemingly like
> "MAX_STEP=0.0001,TOL_AFCN=0.00001", but the computer ran much quicker.
> It's rather terrible. (The prompt also existed.)
>
> In fact, I can get entirely different results from MATLAB 'fsolve'
> function using the same Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm. The results
> from MATLAB don't change with initial values and the residuals are
> negligible, while residuals from IDL lie in between 0.1 and 0.2.
>
> I'm really confused. Could someone help me explain this?
  Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Previous Topic: Re: IDLgrROI bug
Next Topic: jpg image

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 13:48:45 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00500 seconds