IDL 7.0 under ubuntu 9.10 [message #68559] |
Mon, 02 November 2009 23:57  |
Giorgio
Messages: 31 Registered: March 2008
|
Member |
|
|
Hi,
I've installed the new ubuntu 9.10 and now the IDL 7.0 idlde does
not work. I think the problem is with java. I am using ia32-java-6-sun
and I've set it with sudo update-alternatives -all to use it. Does
anyone have the same problem upgrading from ubuntu 9.04 to 9.10?
Thanks,
Giorgio
|
|
|
Re: IDL 7.0 under ubuntu 9.10 [message #68643 is a reply to message #68559] |
Tue, 10 November 2009 05:46  |
Jean H.
Messages: 472 Registered: July 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
> For what its worth, I notice that I've hit a similar problem since
> upgrading to Ubuntu 9.10. idlde no longer works, and complains about 3
> modules in /usr/lib/gio:
>
> /usr/lib/gio/modules/libgiogconf.so: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS64
> Failed to load module: /usr/lib/gio/modules/libgiogconf.so
>
> I have 32 bit versions of each module in /usr/lib32, but IDL doesn't
> seem to know about them.
>
> Chris
This is an old problem. It seems that renaming /usr/lib/gio/ to
/usr/lib/gio_backup/ or whatever is enough... gio is not used by
Eclipse, but it is part of a sub-sub-sub function call in a library that
IDLDE uses... well, anyways, just rename it and the problem goes away!
Otherwise, you will have these error messages each time you start idlde,
without any consequences.
Jean
|
|
|
Re: IDL 7.0 under ubuntu 9.10 [message #68645 is a reply to message #68559] |
Mon, 09 November 2009 17:36  |
Chris[6]
Messages: 84 Registered: July 2008
|
Member |
|
|
On Nov 9, 2:24 am, Reimar Bauer <R.Ba...@fz-juelich.de> wrote:
> Giorgio schrieb:
>
>> Thanks for your information. The issue is that IDL7.0 was working fine
>> underubuntu9.04. I've just upgraded toubuntu9.10 and I have the
>> error on bin.linux.x86 libraries.
>> I've tried for IDL 7.1 and it works just fine. However I do not have a
>> license for IDL 7.1.
>> Is it possible to configure idl7.0 to use the bin.linux.x86_64 folder
>> of idl7.1? I guess it is possible since this is only related to the
>> eclipse workbench and java and not the the idl software itself.
>
>> Giorgio
>
> That would be a bug. Because otherwise noone would pay.
>
> Reimar
For what its worth, I notice that I've hit a similar problem since
upgrading to Ubuntu 9.10. idlde no longer works, and complains about 3
modules in /usr/lib/gio:
/usr/lib/gio/modules/libgiogconf.so: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS64
Failed to load module: /usr/lib/gio/modules/libgiogconf.so
I have 32 bit versions of each module in /usr/lib32, but IDL doesn't
seem to know about them.
Chris
|
|
|
Re: IDL 7.0 under ubuntu 9.10 [message #68649 is a reply to message #68559] |
Mon, 09 November 2009 04:24  |
R.Bauer
Messages: 1424 Registered: November 1998
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Giorgio schrieb:
> Thanks for your information. The issue is that IDL7.0 was working fine
> under ubuntu 9.04. I've just upgraded to ubuntu 9.10 and I have the
> error on bin.linux.x86 libraries.
> I've tried for IDL 7.1 and it works just fine. However I do not have a
> license for IDL 7.1.
> Is it possible to configure idl7.0 to use the bin.linux.x86_64 folder
> of idl7.1? I guess it is possible since this is only related to the
> eclipse workbench and java and not the the idl software itself.
>
> Giorgio
>
That would be a bug. Because otherwise noone would pay.
Reimar
|
|
|
Re: IDL 7.0 under ubuntu 9.10 [message #68650 is a reply to message #68559] |
Mon, 09 November 2009 04:23  |
R.Bauer
Messages: 1424 Registered: November 1998
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Giorgio schrieb:
> Hi,
> I've installed the new ubuntu 9.10 and now the IDL 7.0 idlde does
> not work. I think the problem is with java. I am using ia32-java-6-sun
> and I've set it with sudo update-alternatives -all to use it. Does
> anyone have the same problem upgrading from ubuntu 9.04 to 9.10?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Giorgio
What do you have set in /usr/local/itt/idl706/idlde/idlde.linux.x86.ini
on my box it looks like for 7.0.6
-vm
/usr/lib/jvm/ia32-java-1.5.0-sun-1.5.0.18/jre/bin/
-vmargs
-Xms40M
-Xmx256M
Is this path in 9.10 still the same or does it need adjustments?
cheers
Reimar
|
|
|