comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: IDLgrWindow vs. IDLgrBuffer, font-rendering difference
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: IDLgrWindow vs. IDLgrBuffer, font-rendering difference [message #68889 is a reply to message #68875] Mon, 30 November 2009 08:47 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Karl[1] is currently offline  Karl[1]
Messages: 79
Registered: October 2005
Member
On Nov 30, 9:41 am, David Fanning <n...@dfanning.com> wrote:
> M. Katz writes:
>> On Mac OS X I'm using 1.45 as the scaling factor (i.e. I make the
>> IDLgrBuffer fonts larger by 1.45x to match IDLgrWindow). I have not
>> tested Windows, but David says they match.
>
> What has ITTVIS had to say about this? I was on their
> web page this morning looking for news, but didn't find
> anything in the Tech Tips. I'm never sure, though, if this
> is because there is nothing there or because their hapless
> search engine is still inept. In any case "IDLgrBuffer"
> or "buffer" or "object graphics" didn't turn anything
> up.
>
> Cheers,
>
> David
>
> --
> David Fanning, Ph.D.
> Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
> Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming:http://www.dfanning.com/
> Sepore ma de ni thui. ("Perhaps thou speakest truth.")

I think it has to do with the default RESOLUTION of the IDLgrBuffer
device.

Recall that an IDLgrBuffer is not a physical device. Since there is
no piece of hardware for it to query, it simply sets its RESOLUTION
property to 72 DPI as a somewhat arbitrary, but reasonable, default
value. Since this property is writable, you can change it.

An IDLgrWindow can query the hardware and figure out how big a pixel
is (resolution). It then sets its RESOLUTION property accordingly to
communicate the value to the application; it cannot be changed.

If text is to be drawn at a specific physical size (e.g., 12 points or
12/72 inches), then the object needs to know the size of a pixel in
order to draw something of a specific size. On a 72 DPI device, a 12-
point font would occupy 12 pixels in height. Of course, this is the
size of the entire "box" for the glyph; this does not mean that all
glyphs are 12 pixels tall.

You can specify coordinates in Object Graphics using inches and
centimeters, right? If OG is going to draw a line 1 inch long, it had
better know the size of pixels on the device so it knows how many to
draw to make an inch.

The first post to this thread mentioned a 4/3 scale factor. Many
displays are 96 DPI, which explains that ratio. Perhaps the 1.45
comes from Apple display hardware.

It seems to me that the smart way to fix this is to query the
RESOLUTION from the IDLgrWindow that you want to match up with the
IDLgrBuffer and set the IDLgrBuffer's RESOLUTION property to match.
This should be better than scaling the font size with some fixed
value. It will also work with displays that have different
resolutions than the ones used to compute this fixed scale factor.
Other things in Object Graphics like line widths use the RESOLUTION
property, as well as things specified in inches or centimeters.

It's been awhile and I'm not sure that this is right. But the docs
seem to support the concept. See the reference pages for IDLgrBuffer.

Karl
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: Code snippets from CRU
Next Topic: Problem on where function

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sun Oct 12 12:34:37 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.68009 seconds