comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: A way to measure image blur / glow?
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: A way to measure image blur / glow? [message #69424] Sat, 09 January 2010 00:15
rogass is currently offline  rogass
Messages: 200
Registered: April 2008
Senior Member
On 9 Jan., 03:13, James <donje...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm working with a set of vascular images, taken on a cryo-microtome
> (see my post "An Introduction" from Nov. 17 for more info).  The
> images are acquired by filling blood vessels of a biological sample
> with fluorescent polymer, and repeatedly taking photographs after
> slicing off a tiny layer of tissue.  One major problem is that
> fluorescent material behind the current slice gives off enough light
> to show up in the image, resulting in a diffuse glow around the
> vessels of interest.
>
> I've been trying out the next-image subtraction algorithm (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2743343/), wherein the
> next slice behind the image of interest is blurred, attenuated, and
> subtracted from the current slice.  The preliminary results look very
> good, but I'm looking for a way to automate the choice of optimal
> parameter choices for the Gaussian blur radius and the attenuation
> factor.  So basically, I'm looking for a measure of how sharp, or glow-
> free, an image is.  I've considered the fact that glow is not quite
> the same thing as blur.  With glow, the features are still sharp, but
> there are haloes of not-as-bright pixels around them.  With blur,
> there are no sharp edges.
>
> My professor suggested measuring the magnitude of low frequencies in
> the Fourier Transform of the image, but that lead to the computer
> picking the image where nearly all of the data - glow or not - had
> been subtracted!  So basically, I'm asking if anyone knows a good way
> to measure this without inadvertently subtracting useful data or
> creating false data.
>
> Thanks,
> James Preiss

Maybe a look on the entropy along and across edges will give you some
hints for blurring. May also be that anisotropic diffusion solves your
problems. The halos might be weakened by a histogram linearisation
based on, e.g. native IDL routine or the asinh-approach from David
Fanning.

Regards Chris
  Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Previous Topic: A way to measure image blur / glow?
Next Topic: Re: Mosaic_doit in IDL gives a different result that the ENVI mosaic tool

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 17:08:42 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00546 seconds