comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Image Warp Success?
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Image Warp Success? [message #69732 is a reply to message #69731] Tue, 09 February 2010 12:52 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
David Fanning is currently offline  David Fanning
Messages: 11724
Registered: August 2001
Senior Member
David Fanning writes:

> Has anyone ever had any success using MAP_PROJ_IMAGE to
> warp an image in one map projection into another map
> projection?
>
> Given what I know about the non-reentrant nature of the
> MAP_PROJ_*** routines, I can't image this ever working
> properly, but I thought I would give it a try. I have
> an image in a UTM map projection that I want to convert
> to a Lambert Equal Area projection. The result looks
> like a disaster. I'd pursue this further if someone
> could give me hope. :-(

My inability to get a reasonable result with MAP_PROJ_IMAGE
has turned out to be at least partly due to an incredibly
embarrassing error in my MapCoord object, which I use to
work around many of the reentrant limitations of the
MAP_PROJ_*** routines.

If the desired map projection was passed into the object
as a string (e.g., 'UTM') rather than as an index
(e.g., 101), then the wrong map projection information
was saved in the object. I rarely use map projection
names, which is probably why it took me so long to discover
this grievous error. :-(

In any case, this is fixed now, and I have confirmed that
the output map structure from my object and from MAP_PROJ_INIT
are identical no matter how the map projection is selected.

http://www.dfanning.com/programs/catalyst/source/coordinates /mapcoord__d
efine.pro

Once this problem was fixed, I obtained what appear to be
reasonable results from MAP_PROJ_IMAGE. My apologies for casting
aspertion on code that possibly doesn't deserve it. I do note
that the documenation is not clear as to what the "range"
parameter should be, and that you only get "correct" results if
you specify the range in UV coordinates, rather than the lat/lon
coordinates specified in the on-line help. I learned this only
by comparing the results from the results from ENVI.

Cheers,

David

--
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/
Sepore ma de ni thue. ("Perhaps thos speakest truth.")
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Simultaneous write on textfile over NFS
Next Topic: Re: dereference with wildcard

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 19:59:54 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00366 seconds