comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » IDL 8.0 and compile_opt

Home » Public Forums » archive » IDL 8.0 and compile_opt - Update

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: IDL 8 [message #70412 is a reply to message #70328]

Wed, 07 April 2010 07:43

Paul Van Delst[1]
Messages: 1157
Registered: April 2002

Senior Member

Cliff wrote:
> On Apr 5, 4:42 pm, mgalloy <mgal...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 4/3/10 10:32 AM, Cliff wrote:
>>
>>> I don't suppose you've ever managed to call a fortran function
>>> returning an allocatable array or know whether this is even possible?
>> I don't have experience using Fortran with IDL. By "allocatable" do you
>> mean, allocating the array in Fortran and passing it back to IDL?
>>
> Yes, that's exactly what I meant. I believe that allowing a subroutine
> to return an allocatable array is a new feature in FORTRANas well.

Yes. In addition to this capability being standard in Fortran2003 (not all caps anymore),
Fortran95 compilers that support the TR15581 extension (which is pretty much all current
ones) also allow this functionality.

cheers,

paulv

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		IDL 8.0 and compile_opt - Update By: PaulClaytonAdams on Mon, 22 February 2010 10:45
		Re: IDL 8 By: Cliff on Mon, 05 April 2010 13:51
		Re: IDL 8 By: Paul Van Delst[1] on Wed, 07 April 2010 07:43
		Re: IDL 8 By: Michael Galloy on Mon, 05 April 2010 08:42
		Re: IDL 8 By: Cliff on Sat, 03 April 2010 09:32
		Re: IDL 8 By: Michael Galloy on Sat, 03 April 2010 09:19

Previous Topic:	Best way to generate arrays of coordinates for hypersurface calculations?
Next Topic:	Re: "On UNIX systems, the IDL_IDLBridge requires that the DISPLAY environment variable be set to a valid X Windows display. If no display is available, execution of the IDL_IDLBridge will halt" Why?

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 19:59:52 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00403 seconds