comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Comments on Coding Style
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Comments on Coding Style [message #70674 is a reply to message #70673] Thu, 29 April 2010 12:38 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
penteado is currently offline  penteado
Messages: 866
Registered: February 2018
Senior Member
Administrator
On Apr 29, 4:26 pm, Aram Panasenco <panasencoa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am going to try and use only one header per class that will describe
> the entire class interface. I am using non-standard tags (Name, Design
> Details, Abstraction, Syntax, and Public Methods) instead of the more
> standard (Name, Purpose, Category, Superclasses, Subclasses, Syntax). Is
> that a bad change? What would you like to see different about the header?

If you use one of the standard formats (and tags) for the comments,
then you can use IDLdoc to generate nice documentation pages (which
include very useful features like links and search). If you are not
familiar with it, see

http://idldoc.idldev.com/

Also, using one of the standard formats allows the Workbench to show
the help for the routine.
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: AO, SAO
Next Topic: Writing *.csv files

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sat Oct 11 10:01:46 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.71976 seconds