comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Comments on Coding Style

Home » Public Forums » archive » Comments on Coding Style

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Comments on Coding Style [message #70698]

Wed, 28 April 2010 23:26

Aram Panasenco
Messages: 41
Registered: April 2010

Member

Hey again people,

I have recently switched to a different coding style. I am currently in
the first steps of writing a relatively big (for me at least) solar
software project. I want to keep the source code readable and modifiable
for other programmers, and I also want to use a consistent convention
that other people would want to uphold. I have written a small part of a
standard class that my program will use in a convention that I plan to
keep for all classes.

I want your comments on the programming conventions I use and how I can
change them to make the code more clear and desirable for other
programmers to improve. Some things to consider:

- Should I use comments or is the code (so far) pretty self-explanatory?
- Is the non-standard capitalization annoying you? Should I switch to
the classic IDL capitalization (All-caps for IDL keywords, capitalized
function and procedure names)?
- Is there anything wrong with the way I handle the IDL class? The
routines?
- Anything wrong at all? I'd rather fix it now than thousands of lines
of code later.

Here's the class itself (finally :P)
http://pastebin.com/DXZUsL30

Thank you for your criticism,
~Aram Panasenco

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Comments on Coding Style By: Aram Panasenco on Wed, 28 April 2010 23:26
		Re: Comments on Coding Style By: David Gell on Fri, 30 April 2010 06:07
		Re: Comments on Coding Style By: penteado on Thu, 29 April 2010 19:35
		Re: Comments on Coding Style By: David Fanning on Thu, 29 April 2010 14:30

Previous Topic:	Re: SSW Coordinate Conversions
Next Topic:	How to read field attributes in HDF-EOS

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 18:48:43 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00282 seconds