comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: dealing with arguments

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: dealing with arguments

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: dealing with arguments [message #71118]

Wed, 02 June 2010 15:12

penteado
Messages: 866
Registered: February 2018

Senior Member
Administrator

Use keywords instead of positional arguments:

pro name, mode, s1=s1, s2=s2

That way, when calling the routine you can use any order, or omit any
argument, and they still get associated to the right variables. Also
consider replacing s1 and s2 by more descriptive names, to make it
easier for users to know what the arguments mean. With keywords, you
can still use the short names inside your routine:

pro name, mode, some_argument_name_1=s1, some_other_argument=s2

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: dealing with arguments By: penteado on Wed, 02 June 2010 15:12
		Re: dealing with arguments By: fgg on Wed, 02 June 2010 15:17

Previous Topic:	Re: FOR loop ends one above where it's supposed to
Next Topic:	dealing with arguments

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 19:02:03 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00576 seconds