comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: New Colorbar Missing?
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: New Colorbar Missing? [message #72707 is a reply to message #72706] Sat, 25 September 2010 07:21 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
penteado is currently offline  penteado
Messages: 866
Registered: February 2018
Senior Member
Administrator
On Sep 25, 11:04 am, David Fanning <n...@dfanning.com> wrote:
> I have a COLORBAR *procedure* in the Coyote Library, and
> that is on the path ahead of the <DEFAULT> IDL libraries,
> but IDL has always been able to tell the difference between
> a procedure and a function.
>
> Clearly that procedure got compiled:
>
> IDL> Help, /source
> Compiled Procedures:
> $MAIN$                  
> COLORBAR                  C:\IDL\coyote\colorbar.pro
>
> Compiled Functions:
> FSC_COLOR                 C:\IDL\coyote\fsc_color.pro
> FSC_COLOR_COLOR24         C:\IDL\coyote\fsc_color.pro
> FSC_COLOR_COUNT_ROWS      C:\IDL\coyote\fsc_color.pro
>
> Why is IDL getting confused here? Am I going to have
> to rename most of the routines in my Coyote Library?

I get the same here, if I move the Coyote path ahead of IDL_DEFAULT.
When it finds the first colorbar.pro, it stops looking for others. It
is the same reason that caused the legend procedure in idlastro to be
renamed to al_legend.
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: mpfit questions /strange behavior
Next Topic: IDL_IDLBridge and IDL8

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sat Oct 11 07:51:38 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 2.08197 seconds