| alternative to execute available? [message #72884] |
Wed, 13 October 2010 06:51  |
rogass
Messages: 200
Registered: April 2008
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Hi there,
I'm often using the _extra keyword in my routines together with a
simple approach to give variables values, like this one
pro test_ex, _extra=ex
for i=0l,n_tags(ex)-1l do _=execute((tag_names(ex))[i]+'=ex.(i)')
end
If I would call this like: test,/hello,d=dist(10)
it would give me within the pro: d with the value dist(10) and hello
with the value 1
It works fine, but has one big limitation. I cannot use this technique
if I would like to produce working binaries (sav-files). Is there any
way to avoid the execute call without having information which
keywords were passed to the test_ex routine?
Thanks and regards
CR
|
|
|
|
| Creaso and ITTVIS - I am confused [message #72952 is a reply to message #72884] |
Thu, 14 October 2010 00:37  |
jkeller
Messages: 35
Registered: October 2009
|
Member |
|
|
I was excited about the announcement of ITTVIS buying Creaso to enhance
support in Germany, Austria, Switzerland and Netherlands. I also hoped
for a better pricing of products.
In the meantime the Creaso Homepage redirects to ittvis.com but if I try
to find pricing information there, I am still referred to Creaso.
Does anyone know if pricing/pricing policy has changed?
Sincerely
Jan
|
|
|
|
comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Members
Search
Help
Login
Home
