comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Understanding IDLanROI
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Understanding IDLanROI [message #73004 is a reply to message #72911] Tue, 19 October 2010 10:38 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
David Fanning is currently offline  David Fanning
Messages: 11724
Registered: August 2001
Senior Member
kBob writes:

> To answer my own question ...
>
> Yes, IDLanROI is NOT the IDL routine to perform this check.
>
> After pondering on this for a couple of weeks, I figure what I needed
> to do.
>
> IDLgrROI is the prefer IDL routine to use.
>
> It is a tessellation thing, especially when dealing with State and
> Country Shapefiles that may contain gaps. You may get away with very
> simple polygons using IDLanROI when dealing with a handful of
> vertices, but IDLgrROI and IDLgrROIGroup are the routines you should
> be using along with incorporating IDLgrTessellator in the code.

Can you elaborate a bit on why this "is a tessellation thing"?
I don't really understand what that means. And, supposing
I did understand what it means, what would it have to do
with choosing IDLgrROI over IDLanROI. Isn't IDLgrROI a
subclass of IDLanROI?

Cheers,

David


--
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/
Sepore ma de ni thui. ("Perhaps thou speakest truth.")
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: Still missing features in IDL 8
Next Topic: Subtracting arrays of same dimension, different size - interpolating one to fit the other

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sun Oct 12 16:32:31 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00243 seconds