comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: Thread-Pool for operators?

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Thread-Pool for operators?

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Thread-Pool for operators? [message #73854]

Tue, 30 November 2010 08:17

rogass
Messages: 200
Registered: April 2008

Senior Member

On 30 Nov., 15:49, Paulo Penteado <pp.pente...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Nov 30, 9:15 am, chris <rog...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi folks,
>> as documented thread-pool keywords can be also used for binary and
>> unary operators like GE. The question is, how? :)
>
>> It is clear for 'usual' routines such as TOTAL:
>
>> IDL> r=randomu(sd,100000000l) & t0=systime(1)
>> &_=total(r,TPOOL_MIN_ELTS=n_elements(r)) & print,systime(1)-t0
>> 0.075000048
>> IDL> r=randomu(sd,100000000l) & t0=systime(1) &_=total(r) &
>> print,systime(1)-t0
>> 0.081000090
>
> You need to use the equivalent keywords of the cpu procedure, that
> changes the default used by anything that uses the thread pool.

Ok, thanks. But that is not my intention. Anyway, I know now, this is
only possible, if I would write a wrapper for GE etc.

Cheers

CR

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: Thread-Pool for operators? By: rogass on Tue, 30 November 2010 08:17
		Re: Thread-Pool for operators? By: penteado on Tue, 30 November 2010 06:49

Previous Topic:	Re: IDL - Extracting data from within boundary defined by shapefile
Next Topic:	NG Transparency Bug

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 04:57:29 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.28259 seconds