comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: my god, it's full of stars....
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: my god, it's full of stars.... [message #77213] Wed, 17 August 2011 05:05 Go to next message
Paul Van Delst[1] is currently offline  Paul Van Delst[1]
Messages: 1157
Registered: April 2002
Senior Member
If I don't know what the size of the numbers will be (or if their range is many orders of magnitude), I use exponential
formats, e.g. e13.6.

cheers,

paulv

polystethylene wrote:
> On Aug 16, 10:29 pm, Paul van Delst <paul.vande...@noaa.gov> wrote:
>> The format used to output the number can't "fit it in". E.g.
>>
>> IDL> x=0.631398
>> IDL> print, format='(f10.6)', x
>> 0.631398
>> IDL> x=1000.0
>> IDL> print, format='(f10.6)', x
>> **********
>>
>> So, if the number being output in your file is >= 1000, you'll get stars.
>>
>> The ">=" is subject to precision of course:
>>
>> IDL> x=999.9999
>> IDL> print, format='(f10.6)', x
>> 999.999878
>> IDL> x=999.99999
>> IDL> print, format='(f10.6)', x
>> **********
>>
>> cheers,
>>
>> paulv
>>
>>
>
>
> Hi Paul, thanks for the swift reply.
>
> Does this mean the solution for situations where the number is unknown
> is to print with format D0.6, and not D10.6?
>
>
Re: my god, it's full of stars.... [message #77217 is a reply to message #77213] Tue, 16 August 2011 16:34 Go to previous messageGo to next message
polystethylene is currently offline  polystethylene
Messages: 28
Registered: February 2009
Junior Member
On Aug 16, 10:58 pm, David Fanning <n...@idlcoyote.com> wrote:
> polystethylene writes:
>> Does this mean the solution for situations where the number is unknown
>> is to print with format D0.6, and not D10.6?
>
> It will depend on how anal you are. If you like things
> lined up in nice columns this may not work as well
> as you hoped. :-)
>
> Cheers,
>
> David
>
> P.S. On the other hand, if you don't mind wide columns,
> adding a couple more digits probably wouldn't hurt. You
> might also want to leave some room for negative numbers,
> with their extra minus sign, if you are expecting any.
>
> --
> David Fanning, Ph.D.
> Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
> Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming:http://www.idlcoyote.com/
> Sepore ma de ni thui. ("Perhaps thou speakest truth.")

Thanks David, that clears things up - I opted for the large number to
maintain the straight columns :)
Re: my god, it's full of stars.... [message #77219 is a reply to message #77217] Tue, 16 August 2011 14:58 Go to previous messageGo to next message
David Fanning is currently offline  David Fanning
Messages: 11724
Registered: August 2001
Senior Member
polystethylene writes:

> Does this mean the solution for situations where the number is unknown
> is to print with format D0.6, and not D10.6?

It will depend on how anal you are. If you like things
lined up in nice columns this may not work as well
as you hoped. :-)

Cheers,

David

P.S. On the other hand, if you don't mind wide columns,
adding a couple more digits probably wouldn't hurt. You
might also want to leave some room for negative numbers,
with their extra minus sign, if you are expecting any.


--
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.idlcoyote.com/
Sepore ma de ni thui. ("Perhaps thou speakest truth.")
Re: my god, it's full of stars.... [message #77220 is a reply to message #77219] Tue, 16 August 2011 14:42 Go to previous messageGo to next message
polystethylene is currently offline  polystethylene
Messages: 28
Registered: February 2009
Junior Member
On Aug 16, 10:29 pm, Paul van Delst <paul.vande...@noaa.gov> wrote:
> The format used to output the number can't "fit it in". E.g.
>
> IDL> x=0.631398
> IDL> print, format='(f10.6)', x
>   0.631398
> IDL> x=1000.0
> IDL> print, format='(f10.6)', x
> **********
>
> So, if the number being output in your file is >= 1000, you'll get stars.
>
> The ">=" is subject to precision of course:
>
> IDL> x=999.9999
> IDL> print, format='(f10.6)', x
> 999.999878
> IDL> x=999.99999
> IDL> print, format='(f10.6)', x
> **********
>
> cheers,
>
> paulv
>
>


Hi Paul, thanks for the swift reply.

Does this mean the solution for situations where the number is unknown
is to print with format D0.6, and not D10.6?
Re: my god, it's full of stars.... [message #77221 is a reply to message #77220] Tue, 16 August 2011 14:29 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Paul Van Delst[1] is currently offline  Paul Van Delst[1]
Messages: 1157
Registered: April 2002
Senior Member
The format used to output the number can't "fit it in". E.g.

IDL> x=0.631398
IDL> print, format='(f10.6)', x
0.631398
IDL> x=1000.0
IDL> print, format='(f10.6)', x
**********

So, if the number being output in your file is >= 1000, you'll get stars.

The ">=" is subject to precision of course:

IDL> x=999.9999
IDL> print, format='(f10.6)', x
999.999878
IDL> x=999.99999
IDL> print, format='(f10.6)', x
**********

cheers,

paulv


polystethylene wrote:
> Quick question - some of my data files are being written with the
> likes of:
>
> 5484.487603 0.533930 1.274879
> 5484.488112 1.378365 0.433342
> 5484.488610 0.631398 1.682024
> 5484.489131 ********** 0.913028
> 5484.489628 0.968477 0.610894
> 5484.490126 0.819817 0.674836
> 5484.490635 1.502081 0.369167
>
>
> I rarely see this, but due to the nature of searching for '*********'
> - I can't google this one at all...
>
>
> Any ideas?
Re: my god, it's full of stars.... [message #77442 is a reply to message #77213] Tue, 30 August 2011 07:09 Go to previous message
polystethylene is currently offline  polystethylene
Messages: 28
Registered: February 2009
Junior Member
Thanks for the help everyone, much appreciated.
  Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Previous Topic: Re: FLEXlm, Windows 7 & IDL 6.0
Next Topic: Porting OS X IDL 7.0 to Linux IDL 8.0

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 13:36:40 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00660 seconds