| TIME_TEST notes [message #805] |
Mon, 17 May 1993 10:22 |
sextonm
Messages: 3
Registered: May 1993
|
Junior Member |
|
|
Thanks for all the response to my original request for benchmarks.
I have a few points to make:
1. Per the on-line IDL documentation, the pre-Jul 90 version
of TIME_TEST is 10 (ten) times less intensive than the post-
Jul 90 version. This means that old version of the test
will run about 10 times faster. (I dont know which Version
the change happened at).
2. The last TIME_TEST routine is, in effect, a disk test
(as pointed out by Glen Carver) so the full printout from
the tests is needed for meaningfull comparision.
3. A couple of people have had problems running GRAPHICS_TIMES.
The correct spelling of the routine is as above, and the
routine is only compiled by running the TIME_TEST routine.
I'm compiling all results into some kind of usable format, and will
post summary time in the next few weeks.
Matt Sexton Sexton@claes.space.lockheed.com
|
|
|
|
comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Members
Search
Help
Login
Home
