comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Parallel Processing in IDL
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Parallel Processing [message #80617 is a reply to message #72824] Thu, 28 June 2012 10:02 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
stefan.meingast is currently offline  stefan.meingast
Messages: 30
Registered: June 2012
Member
Am Donnerstag, 28. Juni 2012 18:40:15 UTC+2 schrieb (unbekannt):
> On Thursday, June 28, 2012 10:05:24 AM UTC-4, stefan....@gmail.com wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I have developed a code which takes a couple of hours to run and I am aware of the fact that IDL automatically parallelizes some vector operations and one should prefer those instead of looping through arrays.
>>
>> I have done all that but still I know I could speed up things by a factor of 2 when I do certain things on 2 cores.
>>
>> For instance, somewhere in the program I pass some arrays to a function and this function then returns and equally large array with some calculated values. This is all done with one core since the operations in the function are not parallelized.
>>
>> However, I could split up the input arrays into to equally large parts and perform the calcualtions for each of those two on one core. In the end, when both are finished I could just concatenate the result-arrays.
>>
>> Is this possible in some easy way?
>>
>> thanks for your help :)
>
> Yeah, that sounds like it's what you want. Post back if it's not clear how to proceed. I use this stuff all the time for several big pipelines that I use, but it only works if you've got a relatively small amount of data to process (which may take a long time). Then you want repeat this procedure for many similar units of data.
>
> Russell

Hey

It works but I had to take a step back since I ran into some quite ridiculous problem...

It actually takes longer for IDL to set up, say, two child processes and then run them on separate cores as compared to running through 2 iterations on one core.

So I implemented the IDLbridge right at the beginning and separated the whole process into 2 substeps and not just this one step where I have to do one calculation.

If someone else should read this in the future:
It took me about 10 minutes to set up my first code to run on 2 cores without knowing ANYTHING about that stuff.

Here is what guided me through:
http://slugidl.pbworks.com/w/page/29199259/Child%20Processes

very easy
cheers
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: Matching elements in two arrays of different sizes
Next Topic: Re: cgHistoplot and multiplot

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 15:48:46 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00486 seconds